While liberals continue to try to disarm America, one rifle at a time, conservatives have only one concern . . . how can we possibly fire more bullets? The answer comes in the form of a prototype created by Metal Storm that fires 1,000,000 rounds per minute. If you buried ten of those on a battlefield and fired them at charging enemies, the battle would last less than three minutes.
The highest rate of fire for a service weapon currently belongs to the M134 mini-gun, designed in the 1960s for helicopters and armored vehicles. It fires 6,000 rounds per minute or 1000 rounds per second.
See this amazing gun on the next page:
And yer saying I can’t have a 30 round mag. Whats good for the goose is good for the gander
You can’t stack a million rounds into this gun so the claim is false. It should say , if the gun could store 1,000,000 rounds it could fire them in one minute.
Exactly my
Point, to fire 1,000,000 rounds of amo with an average of 5/8 or .625 inches long would require barrel length of 625,000 inches long or 52,083 feet long. Thus gun has 36 barrels so each barrel would have to be 1,446 feet long.
Not possible, with 36 barrels to contain 1,000,000 rounds of ammunition if each bullet were .625 inches long, the 36 barrels would have to be 1,446 feet long.
I want one!
Get the hell out of here. Impossible. Even if hypothetically possible, the barrel would melt or the gun would jam long before the minute was over. By the way, 6000 rounds per minute equates to ONE HUNDRED rounds per second….NOT 1,000.
Old News !!!!
How is that possible??? Barrel would get to hot an warp.bullets have to be on a belt feed
The mini gun that is on a copter is a six barrel gun. because of the speed the barrel turns it can’t be hand held unlike the terminator movies where Arnold rips it off and starts shooting besides it has an electronic trigger. But I agree this gun is possible to or may be has the potential at a million rounds but not as hand held gun even with stacked ammo.
S**t that suppose to say impossible.