As the power and influence of the mainstream press has been challenged by alternative sources of news, the monopoly of the globalist power-brokers over what news is presented and the debate over that news has been broken. While this has opened the door to the dissemination of some really bizarre theories, it has also made it possible for serious alternatives to the official narrative to be presented and considered.
Keep in mind, though, that those globalists are not going to go quietly into the night, giving up on their goals of world domination. Note even close. So we are compelled to examine possible scenarios they might create, regardless of how unpleasant they might be.
With all that out of the way, what are we to make of the speculation over the possibility of assassination attempts being made on either or both presidential candidates?
Dang Ron Stoner, I hate to say it bro, but google is easy. Probably should use it before telling someone to do their homework before lecturing. LMAO
Punting the ball not putting the ball
This makes no sense, and is ridiculously dangerous. We do not want anyone hurt , despite disagreements.
Michael A:July 23rd, 2013 at 9:54 amOnce and for all let’s take pudding off of the table. “The proof of the pudding is in the tasting” originated separately from “The proof is in the putting”. One can see where there may have been confusion with the similarly sounding words puddingand putting. And since “putting” is not a common term in contemporary lexicography, one’s thoughts go immediately to what you are familiar with, so everyone thinks they are hearing “pudding”. The actual phrase comes from the an archaic use of the word “put” which, in the 17th & 18th Centuries, meant“to test”. In this sense, to “put” something forward, meant to “test” it’s validity in public.“The proof sir, of your claim that my wife had carnal relations with your goat is in the putting forth of evidence that supportsyour ridiculous accusation”.Thus, the truth, or “proof” of something was considered valid only after the “putting” forth, or presenting of the evidence to support the claim. Thus, “the proof is in the putting”. Now, enough with the pudding…..
Lies to gain sympathy
WHAT THIS IDIOTS DONT UNDERSTAND IS, SHE WILL CONTINUE KILLING PEOPLE OF HER OWN ORGANIZATION, BECAUSE THEY DON’T WANT TO DO WHAT SHE WANT, “””””” JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA
SHE WILL$#%&!@*ON YOU AND YOU WILL HAVE TO EAT IT,
BY BY BY BY BY BY BY AMERICA
Ron Stoner awesome. I never knew this as you said I took it as pudding,,,but ya explanation of to put. Makes since,,thanks .learn sumthing new every day
C**t still breathes….
I woukdn.t lose a wink of sleep
So here’s the REAL story. Amb. Stevens was sent to Benghazi post haste in order to retrieve US made Stinger missiles supplied to Ansar al Sharia without Congressional oversight or permission. Hillary brokered the deal through Stevens and a private arms dealer named Marc Turi. Then some of the shoulder fired missiles ended up in Afghanistan used against our own military. It was July 25th, 2012 when a Chinook helicopter was taken down by one of our own Stingers, but the idiot Taliban didn’t arm the missile and the Chinook didn’t explode, but had to land anyway. An ordnance team recovered the serial number off the missile which led back to a cache of Stingers being kept in Qatar by the CIA. Obama and Hillary were now in full panic mode and Stevens was sent in to retrieve the rest of the Stingers. This was a “do-or-die” mission, which explains the stand down orders given to multiple commando teams. It was the State Dept, not the CIA that supplied them to our sworn enemies, because Petraeus wouldn’t supply these deadly weapons due to their potential use on commercial aircraft. Then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus after he refused to testify that he OK’d the BS talking points about a spontaneous uprising due to a Youtube video. Obama and Hillary committed treason…and THIS is what the investigation is all about, why she had a private server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and why Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was because of a Youtube video, even though everyone knew it was not. Further…the Taliban knew that this administration aided and abetted the enemy without Congressional approval when Boehner created the Select Cmte, and the Taliban began pushing the Obama Administration for the release of 5 Taliban Generals. Bowe Bergdahl was just a pawn…everyone KNEW he was a traitor. So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised…and a woman that is a serial liar, perjured herself multiple times at the Hearing whom is running for POTUS. Only the Dems, with their hands out, palms up, will support her. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft was called in…because the administration knew our enemies had Stingers