With tensions between the United States and North Korea rising daily, political and financial observers are beginning to contemplate what an outright war between the two countries could mean and how it would play out.
Of course, they have the benefit of the prior Korean War from 1950 to 1953 to see its devastating impact on South Korea in terms of lives lost and economic dislocation, not to mention the loss of almost 34,000 American soldiers.
The difficulty lies in considering all the possible scenarios and their various permutations. Complicating matters is the fact that both sides now have nuclear weapons. Those means of mass destruction could, in fact, push the two adversaries into considering a diplomatic path to settle differences instead of all-out war.
The tough talk from both sides has unsettled financial markets a bit as analysts consider the impact not only in Southeast Asia, but globally.
On the next page, learn about the possible scenarios and how they could play out for the principal parties to the conflict: North Korea, South Korea and the United States.
To avoid an all put war….kim Jung UN…needs to be taken out along with his top leadership.
Really asinine comment. Perhaps we should send them a payoff like Iran . Thats moronic move will be another problem real soon.
Really asinine comment. Perhaps we should send them a payoff like Iran . Thats moronic move will be another problem real soon.
Yeaaaah…..War time again !!!!
And as you scorch them long a couple at Iran. Two bad guys with one shot
That’s amusing the Democrat have no connection with rational thinking. Clinton actually escalated this issue with no foresight. This isn’t an ethical regime it’s today’s version of$#%&!@*s vs Chamberlin. Expecting a different result is absurd and our future dealing with fanatical Iran will be just as bad.PATHETIC VIEWPOINTS ARE A PROGRESSIVE SOCIALIST DEMOCRAT SPECIALITY.
Frank Allen Lumpkin Jr.
Frank Allen Lumpkin Jr.
Frank Allen Lumpkin Jr.
Frank Allen Lumpkin Jr.