With tensions between the United States and North Korea rising daily, political and financial observers are beginning to contemplate what an outright war between the two countries could mean and how it would play out.
Of course, they have the benefit of the prior Korean War from 1950 to 1953 to see its devastating impact on South Korea in terms of lives lost and economic dislocation, not to mention the loss of almost 34,000 American soldiers.
The difficulty lies in considering all the possible scenarios and their various permutations. Complicating matters is the fact that both sides now have nuclear weapons. Those means of mass destruction could, in fact, push the two adversaries into considering a diplomatic path to settle differences instead of all-out war.
The tough talk from both sides has unsettled financial markets a bit as analysts consider the impact not only in Southeast Asia, but globally.
On the next page, learn about the possible scenarios and how they could play out for the principal parties to the conflict: North Korea, South Korea and the United States.
ACTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES…
What’s going to happen when they drop a nuclear bomb in your neighborhood who you going to blame Trump
WHY LET THINGS GET TO THE POINT OF FIRING MISSILES AT ONE ANOTHER. WHY NOT INSTEAD WORK TO PEACEFULLY RESOLVE OUR ISSUES. THERE ARE BETTER WAYS TO HANDLE AND RESOLVE THINGS. START USING OUR BRAINS AND COMON SENSES. STOP HUNGERING FOR WAR! MORONS…
THIS LITTLE FAT SLOB NEEDS TO BE PUT DOWN,
Next question what are you going to do when they try to your words tell the United States what to do
They aren’t Gary Browers, not unless the U.S. tries to take them out. If the U.S. had followed your advice during the Cold War none of us would be here today.
This has been going on for years
If if was a fifth (wiskey) you’d be drunk.
Barack Obama was briefed on North Korea’s miniaturized nuclear capability back in 2013 he did nothing and the news reported nothing
You don’t get how mutually assured destruction works do you Gary Browers?