With tensions between the United States and North Korea rising daily, political and financial observers are beginning to contemplate what an outright war between the two countries could mean and how it would play out.
Of course, they have the benefit of the prior Korean War from 1950 to 1953 to see its devastating impact on South Korea in terms of lives lost and economic dislocation, not to mention the loss of almost 34,000 American soldiers.
The difficulty lies in considering all the possible scenarios and their various permutations. Complicating matters is the fact that both sides now have nuclear weapons. Those means of mass destruction could, in fact, push the two adversaries into considering a diplomatic path to settle differences instead of all-out war.
The tough talk from both sides has unsettled financial markets a bit as analysts consider the impact not only in Southeast Asia, but globally.
On the next page, learn about the possible scenarios and how they could play out for the principal parties to the conflict: North Korea, South Korea and the United States.
much more of the content from the original source was placed onto the page, otherwise there isnt enough content to justify the title.
Generally we can use up to 40%, but that can occasionally be broken especially in cases like this
Mad Dog. Sempri Fi. I live amongst shepherds.
WAR WILL NEVER TRULY RESOLVE THE CONFLICTING PROBLEMS THAT WE HAVE BETWEEN US, WAR WILL ONLY CONTINUE TO FURTHER OUR CONFLICTING PROBLEMS…!!!!! HELLO ARE YOU NOT PAYING ANY ATTENTION TO RATIONAL LOGICAL REASONING….. WISE THE HELL UP TRUMP, WISE THE HELL UP KIM JONG UN, WIE THE HELL UP ALL MANKIND ALL ACROSS THE EARTH…..!!! THINGS HAVE TO START POSITIVELY CHANGING IF WE EVER TRULY WISH FOR THINGS TO BECOME BETTER FOR US AND OUR WORLD… THERE ARE MORE CIVILIZED WAYS OF HANDLING AND RESOLVING OUR CONFLICTING DISPUTES SO FIND THEM RATHER THAN USING THE OPTION OF WAR!
Nobody wins in any war Liam Cownden 🙁
Then BOOM! All dead! Lmao…..Trumpd!
When he says “I’m going to burn America to Ash” (when he can) playing diplomacy until he can is moronic…..Kim has no interest in diplomacy anyways. Taking him out is the best option.
So what do we do if North Korea sends a nuclear missile over and wipes out a large city? Do we shake our finger and say, you’d better quit that?
No, they need to accept that they cannot dictate everyone’s affairs like they claim N.Korea of doing to their citizens. If the U.S. wasn’t trying to destroy N.K. this wouldn’t be an issue. What the news fails to mention are that the only threats made are in the context of the U.S. trying to topple them. Recognize their sovereignty and leave them alone, problem solved.
Problem with the liberals Michael Preston . They actually think NK wants a peaceful resolution lmmfao!
If they could Nuke LA they would have already…..you idiots want us to wait until it’s too late out of some stupid self riteousnes. If Trump attecked now you would “What the$#%&!@*did you just do?” If NK Nuked the West Coast tomorrow you would “why the$#%&!@*didn’t Trump DO SOMETHING? Kim kept saying he was going to nuke us!”
Poor Trump is damned either way.