The mainstream media can’t seem to figure out why Hillary Clinton lost in November — but they’ve got a few working theories.
According to the press, Clinton’s loss had nothing to do with her own shortcomings. It wasn’t because she failed to visit Wisconsin — a state she lost to Donald Trump — nor was it her relative lack of interest in Pennsylvania and Michigan. They also refuse to acknowledge the fact that Clinton had no platform other than attacking Trump.
Instead, they think the reasons are less obvious — and more sinister.
If you haven’t guessed it yet, they’re decided that Clinton lost because of racism.
This theory may not make much sense, since both candidates were white, but it’s not new. The media tried peddling this absurd theory long before Clinton lost.
Now that Clinton reemerged from post-election hiding, the media are once again trying to defend her loss with accusations of racism.
Read about the Washington Post’s latest racist accusations against Trump supporters on the next page:
Yup! And the Great Flood was caused by a drought!
when will Hillary and the Democrats stop accusing, looking for ways and blaming other people for their failure to run a successful campaign.. The fact is ….Hillary was not wanted!
no drunken stupidity
I was thinking lots of brown people voted for him to
Excuses
No. It was do to her being A lier and A crook
Here’s why she lost
The writers at the Post can’t be that stupid or misinformed…can they?
no because clintons are all liars and thiefs.
Well the Russian thing isn’t working let’s try something else