The mainstream media can’t seem to figure out why Hillary Clinton lost in November — but they’ve got a few working theories.
According to the press, Clinton’s loss had nothing to do with her own shortcomings. It wasn’t because she failed to visit Wisconsin — a state she lost to Donald Trump — nor was it her relative lack of interest in Pennsylvania and Michigan. They also refuse to acknowledge the fact that Clinton had no platform other than attacking Trump.
Instead, they think the reasons are less obvious — and more sinister.
If you haven’t guessed it yet, they’re decided that Clinton lost because of racism.
This theory may not make much sense, since both candidates were white, but it’s not new. The media tried peddling this absurd theory long before Clinton lost.
Now that Clinton reemerged from post-election hiding, the media are once again trying to defend her loss with accusations of racism.
Read about the Washington Post’s latest racist accusations against Trump supporters on the next page:
No it was not! She was a terrible representative of the Democratic Party, as is all of them NOW!
Boy you people can’t come up with nothing else but you can hit the woman card or you can hit the race card that’s a liberal and a Democrat for you
HOW ABT SHES JUST A LYING SCUMHAG??
Sick people in this world.
Her and Bill are the biggest racist ever
Yeah, so what? The important thing is she lost.
I’m a woman and I didn’t vote for her. So that makes me a racist? Lady you lost BECAUSE we did not want a murderer leading our Country!
Phyllis, you could say the same about Don
I guess maybe we are. We don’t like BLM, we certainly don’t like ISIS, we don’t like muslims and we don’t like idiots of any color.
Her loss was because she can’t tell the truth