Just moments after Antonin Scalia’s untimely death, D.C. was lit aflame with controversy over the nomination of his replacement. Republicans said that a replacement should be appointed by the next President, and the Democrats responded by attacking the GOP’s actions as unconstitutional.
Never one to fall out of step with her party, Elizabeth Warren unsurprisingly sided with her fellow Democrats, going so far as to accuse Republican love for the constitution was nothing more than “empty talk.”
If Warren truly had the grasp of the Constitution she claims she has, she would acknowledge the fact that sending someone to the Supreme Court is a two-branch process, not just the Presidents’.
She may be right, the American people did have a say in the nomination process when they elected Barack Obama to the oval office, but they also had a say when they acknowledged their mistake and sent the President a Republican Senate just two years later.
Somehow, though, she doesn’t seem to agree. See her full statement on the next page:
stand up for america for once , do not let him do this, to replace the man in a few days is no respect for his passing, no trust with our goverment any more
Hahahaha,,,,but it is constitutional to harass gun owners
shut up you f**e indian…
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/02/dems_in_senate_passed_a_resolution_in1960_against_election_year_supreme_court_appointments.html
f**k you$#%&!@*hole
What constitution do democrats read!
Then Democratic opposition to George W. Bush’s appointments for the last 18 months of his time in office was also unconstitutional.
Senator Warren you are an IDIOT POS who needs to be Replaced !!
HA. !!!
What would a make believe indIan know. She needs to go.