Just moments after Antonin Scalia’s untimely death, D.C. was lit aflame with controversy over the nomination of his replacement. Republicans said that a replacement should be appointed by the next President, and the Democrats responded by attacking the GOP’s actions as unconstitutional.
Never one to fall out of step with her party, Elizabeth Warren unsurprisingly sided with her fellow Democrats, going so far as to accuse Republican love for the constitution was nothing more than “empty talk.”
If Warren truly had the grasp of the Constitution she claims she has, she would acknowledge the fact that sending someone to the Supreme Court is a two-branch process, not just the Presidents’.
She may be right, the American people did have a say in the nomination process when they elected Barack Obama to the oval office, but they also had a say when they acknowledged their mistake and sent the President a Republican Senate just two years later.
Somehow, though, she doesn’t seem to agree. See her full statement on the next page:
But when Schumer said it 18 months left in Bush’s term you agreed .Hypocrite we the people are going to see heads roll
Get back in your plastic T pee you fucktard lieing$#%&!@*
Screw that commi$#%&!@*Warren
Which is worse, constitutionally…An empty seat for a little while, or plugging a shredder into the wall and placing it in the ninth seat?
Did they get all the lead out of her head.
Check the facts ms warren! Demo did it too!
Can’t any of these fools tell the truth
Chuck Schumer did it.
Why are they all of a sudden concerned about the Constitution?
But the reverse was ok in 2007. Liberal logic, review your resolutions.