Just moments after Antonin Scalia’s untimely death, D.C. was lit aflame with controversy over the nomination of his replacement. Republicans said that a replacement should be appointed by the next President, and the Democrats responded by attacking the GOP’s actions as unconstitutional.
Never one to fall out of step with her party, Elizabeth Warren unsurprisingly sided with her fellow Democrats, going so far as to accuse Republican love for the constitution was nothing more than “empty talk.”
If Warren truly had the grasp of the Constitution she claims she has, she would acknowledge the fact that sending someone to the Supreme Court is a two-branch process, not just the Presidents’.
She may be right, the American people did have a say in the nomination process when they elected Barack Obama to the oval office, but they also had a say when they acknowledged their mistake and sent the President a Republican Senate just two years later.
Somehow, though, she doesn’t seem to agree. See her full statement on the next page:
No Warren is full of Bull-Manure.
Since when did dems care about the Constitution? When it suits them.
Cry “constitution” when it suits you.
Is she some of the OLD WHITE people they want to get rid of ? She and that ugly STUPID ole black hog with braids out of Texas are about the stupidist people in congress ! I don’t care how much education you claim to have if you don’t have common sense YOU are stupid !
Well guess what motherfuckers Obama has never given a rat’s$#%&!@*about the Constitution and neither have the Liberals are Democrats so why all of a sudden now is it so “unconstitutional” lmao the things that make you go hmmm
You,really unbelieveable!!!!! Use the Constitution when it suit you, trash it when it doesn,t.
warren no more then the dems that did the very same thing..
Bitch shut up and sit down
Its called advice and consent. They don’t have to concent. BORK rind a bell?
Nothing opposing Obama is unconstitutional !