Socialism always starts as a “people’s movement,” with mindless and ignorant people being directed by elitist con men in the background, telling the foolish that by bringing down the “rich,” everyone will share in the abundance that socialism will bring. It is always a lie, and invariably almost all the people end up in poverty, with the exception of the top socialist leaders who live like kings. Fidel Castro is certainly one who has lived that life, and his protege, Hugo Chavez destroyed the Venezuelan economy pursuing the same socialist policies.
When the economy comes crashing down, it is necessary for the leadership to blame an outside source, and when Chavez was alive, he continually named the United States for all of the woes the country was suffering from. In fact, the oil rich country provides 9 percent of the U.S. gross oil imports, which must be a considerable sum of export income to the nation of 30 million people. As such, the U.S. provided a huge portion of the countries income, but Chavez resented that as well.
Venezuela has expropriated foreign and domestic businesses, which means that the people have little invested in the country and are becoming very unhappy with the leadership as it nosedives to complete economic ruin.
For more on the Venezuelan “people’s paradise,” see page 2:
http://ReferDone.com/?share=7605
http://ReferDone.com/?share=7605
Doesn’t it ever seem strange that these countries that are socialist and all about people seem to have armies that are huge and more than willing to fight their own people. Just a coincidence. Idk. Something tells me not so much.
Thank god we have Trump,the savior of the free world,riding his limousine to save us . lmmfao,he won’t even be able to beat Killary.He has as much appeal as a bug gnawed turnip.
Good read
Thank god we didn’t vote in Bernie Sanders. God save us if Hillary Clinton is elected. This will be Americans future.
wheres the proof socialism caused this? If i had to guess id say its the fact that their exports and major source of income plummeted and left them with alot more expendatures than income. This is getting closer to a reality for America, where we print money to stay afloat, only setting us up for failure. Resourced Based Economy is needed then we add from there. fun fact America thrived during its implementations of socialist programs from after WW2 til the 80s. what chaned? wealth inequality. We have the man power and the recources to create a high standard of living for everyone, we just dont have the money. see the real problem?
wheres the proof socialism caused this? If i had to guess id say its the fact that their exports and major source of income plummeted and left them with alot more expendatures than income. This is getting closer to a reality for America, where we print money to stay afloat, only setting us up for failure. Resourced Based Economy is needed then we add from there. fun fact America thrived during its implementations of socialist programs from after WW2 til the 80s. what chaned? wealth inequality. We have the man power and the recources to create a high standard of living for everyone, we just dont have the money. see the real problem?
wheres the proof socialism caused this? If i had to guess id say its the fact that their exports and major source of income plummeted and left them with alot more expendatures than income. This is getting closer to a reality for America, where we print money to stay afloat, only setting us up for failure. Resourced Based Economy is needed then we add from there. fun fact America thrived during its implementations of socialist programs from after WW2 til the 80s. what chaned? wealth inequality. We have the man power and the recources to create a high standard of living for everyone, we just dont have the money. see the real problem?
how exactly is socialism to blame? im looking for a detailed explanation so i can better understand. where did this $9T go to once we borrowed it? What makes Obama a socialist? what is socialism?