A recent survey of state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies, entitled “Understanding Law Enforcement Intelligence Processes,” reveals that the sovereign citizen is considered the top domestic terror threat by those that ‘protect us’ – above Islamist extremists and militia/patriot groups who round out the top 3 respectively.
Go to Page 2 to read more:
Of course they believe we are terrorsist !!! They know how easily we can take away their power !!!!!
Maybe so, BUT…..there are more of us then their are of them.
“Sovereign Citizen” is an oxymoronic “term.” Just like “illegal alien” or “War on Terror” or “War on Drugs” These are political propaganda terms.
Look up both words individually. Look up the legal definitions. A citizen can’t be sovereign.
You might want to look into that word citizen…
PEOPLE —> GOVERNMENT —> CITIZENS
http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/pvc.htm
Here is a typical example:
As one of the People you have a right to travel, unrestricted, upon the public highways. You have right to carry guests with you in your automobile. You have a right to own a gun and that right shall not be impaired by your servant, the government. You have a right to a grand jury indictment and a trial by jury, that is a trial directly by the people, not the government.
As one of the citizens, you may not travel by automobile unless you are either a licensed motor vehicle driver, or you are a passenger with permission to be on board. Gun ownership is a privilege subject to definition and regulation. You do not have a right to a jury trial in all cases, and no right to grand jury indictment–a trial is a trial by the government, not the people.
ONE OF THE PEOPLE OR ONE OF THE CITIZENS?
ONE OF THE PRIORITY STOCK OR COMMON STOCK?
ONE OF THE CREDITORS OR ONE OF THE DEBTORS?
ONE IN THE REALITY OR ONE IN THE FICTION?
Perez v. Brownell, 356 U.S. 44, 7; 8 S. Ct. 568, 2 L. Ed. 2d 603 (1958) “…in our country the people are sovereign and the government cannot sever its relationship to them by taking away their citizenship.”
” A “US Citizen” upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in “interstate commerce”, as a “resident” does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states. Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914)”
“The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the “citizenship” to the agencies of government.”
City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944
“A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government …” Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383
“The persons declared to be citizens are ‘…all persons born or naturalized in the UNITED STATES and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’ The evident meaning of these last words is, not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the UNITED STATES, but completely subject.” Elk v. Wilkins, 112 US 94.
“Since the 14th Amendment makes one a Citizen of the state where ever he resides, the fact of residence creates universally recognized reciprocal duties of protection by the state and of allegiance and support by the Citizen. The latter obviously includes a duty to pay taxes, and their nature and measure is largely a political matter.” – Miller Brothers vs Maryland, 347 U.S. 340, at 345 (1954).
“On the other hand, there is a significant historical fact in all of this. Clearly, one of the purposes of the 13th and 14th Amendments and of the 1866 act and of section 1982 was to give the Negro citizenship. . .”
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. (1967), 379 F.2d 33, 43.
“The object of the 14th Amendment, as is well known, was to confer upon the colored race the right of citizenship.”
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649, 692.
“The governments of the United States and of each state of the several states are distinct from one another. The rights of a citizen under one may be quite different from those which he has under the other”.
Colgate v. Harvey, 296 U.S. 404; 56 S.Ct. 252 (1935)
“There is a difference between privileges and immunities belonging to the citizens of the United States as such, and those belonging to the citizens of each state as such”.
Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41 (1900)
“The rights and privileges, and immunities which the fourteenth constitutional amendment and Rev. St. section 1979 [U.S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1262], for its enforcement, were designated to protect, are such as belonging to citizens of the United States as such, and not as citizens of a state”.
Wadleigh v. Newhall 136 F. 941 (1905)
“…rights of national citizenship as distinct from the fundamental or natural rights inherent in state citizenship”.
Madden v. Kentucky, 309 U.S. 83: 84 L.Ed. 590 (1940)
“Citizenship in the United States is a dual relation, national and state. In so far as it relates to the national government, it embraces all persons within the fourteenth amendment of the federal Constitution, providing that all persons born or naturalized in the United States and of the state wherein they reside. Citizenship of a state, however, means residence by a citizen of the United States in a state with an intention of remaining.” Hammerstein v. Lyne, 200 F. 165; Cassies v. Ballon, 31 U.S. 761.
“The distinction between citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a state is clearly recognized and established. Not only may a man be a citizen of the United States without being a citizen of a state, but an important element is necessary to convert the former into the latter. He must reside within the state to make him a citizen of it, but it is only necessary that he should be born or naturalized in the United States to be a citizen of the Union. It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of the United States, and a citizenship of a state, which are distinct from each other, and which depend upon different characteristics or circumstances in the individual.” Slaughterhouse Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 73-74; 21 L.Ed. 394
“There are, then, under our republican form of government, two classes of citizens, on of the United States and one of the state.” Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson County, 160 Ala 155, 48 So. 788.
The Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646 – “A ‘citizen of the United States is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.”
CITIZENSHIP (American Citizen v. U.S. Citizen Under Collective Entity Rule)
American Citizen or electing to proceed as a U.S. Citizen Under the Collective Entity Rule
There appears to be a misunderstanding by most people as to the difference between a natural biological person and the artificial person created by the legislative process This will explain that difference.
John Joseph Smith, is a natural and thereby, biological flesh and blood, man or woman, a creation of God with unalienable rights inherent from creation.
JOHN JOSEPH SMITH, is an artificial person, a resident [res ident], a citizen of the United States and thereby, out of necessity, created by the government for the seeming purpose of unilateral control over all commercial process as that process applies to the natural individual men and women.
In basic English grammar, a name spelled in upper and lower case, such as John Joseph Smith, is a substantive given name and indicative to identify the biological flesh and blood man, or woman.
Person. In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person), though by statute term may include labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Ed.
On the other hand, a name spelled in all caps or upper case, such as JOHN JOSEPH SMITH, is indicative of an artificial or constructive person, owing its allegiance to its creator, the legislative process. A government created and thereby controlled and regulated entity.
Artificial persons. Persons created and devised by human laws for the purposes of society and government, as distinguished from natural persons. Corporations are examples of artificial persons. Black’s 6th Ed.
U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)“The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.”
The “United States” is defined in Title 28 USC Sec. 3002(15)(A) as a “Federal corporation”. It is also the controlling municipal corporation of the many inferior municipal and thereby, subsidiary corporations i.e. instrumentalities of the U.S. Inc.
Municipal. In narrower, more common, sense, it means pertaining to a local governmental unit, commonly, a city or town or other governmental unit. In its broader sense, it means pertaining to the public or governmental affairs of a state or nation or of a people. Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Ed.
So the federal corporation United States, that pertains to the public affairs of a people, would be a municipal corporation. The federal government pertains to protecting the affairs of its sovereign people.
Municipal corporation. A body corporate consisting of the inhabitants of a designated area created by the legislature with or without the consent of such inhabitants for governmental purposes.
A municipal corporation has a dual character, the one public and the other private, and exercises corresponding twofold functions and duties — one class consisting of those acts performed by it in the exercise of delegated sovereign powers for benefit of people generally, as the arm of the state, enforcing general laws made in pursuance of general policy of the state, and the other consisting of acts done in exercise of power of the municipal corporation for its own benefit, or for the benefit of its citizens alone, or citizens of the municipal corporation and its immediate locality. Black’s 6th Ed.
A municipal corporation is an artificial person, as shown above, and consists of the general inhabitants called citizens, and these artificial persons (citizens) were created by the legislature. A corporation can be a citizen itself, and that corporation can have its own citizens. A corporation also has it’s own officers. When a corporation is dissolved, then the officers of that corporation no longer exist. A government has it’s own citizens and employees. When that government is dissolved, then those citizens also cease to exist, since both officers and citizens of a corporation are both artificial persons.
Corporate citizen. Corporate status in the state of incorporation . . . Black’s 6th Ed.
A municipal corporation in its broader sense, such as the United States, consists of the inhabitants (U.S. citizens) of a designated area (federal United States). A corporation can through its legislative branch create artificial persons, who are termed citizens of the municipal corporation.
Can an artificial person or entity create a biological flesh and blood natural man? NO! Can a creator create a being, superior to itself as the creator? NO! Can an artificial person (LEGISLATURE) create another artificial person? YES!
Whereas, when the municipal corporation United States, creates a citizen through the legislative process, that citizen is then relegated to the mere contemplation of a corporate U.S.citizen. Said corporate citizen’s name is evidenced in all capital or upper case letters, indicating that it is an artificial person, as distinguished from a natural or biological person whose name is “Capitalized, using upper and lower case letters. The corporate citizen is subject to its creator, the U.S. government, and thereby, subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of its creator.
COLLECTIVE ENTITY RULE
Braswell v. United States, 487 U.S. 99 (1988) This doctrine – known as the collective entity rule-has a lengthy and distinguished pedigree.
What is a “collective entity”? An “add on entity” so to speak, and thereby collective, attaching to the natural person much as a leech. Since the status of U.S. citizen can be created by naturalization let’s see what naturalization is, and determine if a U.S. citizen is in fact, the inferior and thereby constructive entity of the perceived collective entity, which of necessity, requires the biological element to complete the ungodly mix of this scheme.
Naturalization. The process by which a person acquires nationality after birth and becomes entitled to the privileges of U.S. citizenship. In the United States collective naturalization occurs when designated groups are made citizens by treaty (as Louisiana Purchase), or by a law of Congress (as in annexation of Texas and Hawaii). Black’s 6th Ed.
Person: Scope and delineation of term necessary for determining to whom the Fourteenth Amendment of Constitution affords protections since this Amendment expressly applies to “person”.
Let’s review the definition of artificial person.
Artificial persons. Persons created and devised by human laws for the purposes of society and government, as distinguished from natural persons. Corporations are examples of artificial persons. Black’s 6th Ed.
The 14th Amendment applies to “persons,” and person in legal parlance means an artificial person, in distinction from a natural person. “Collective” “naturalization occurs when designated groups” (inhabitants) “are made (created) citizens by a law of Congress”.These artificial persons were “created and devised by constructive human laws (14th Amendment U.S.citizen) for the purpose to (re-venue) the natural person into the “venue” of a constructive society and subject to exclusive government control, and evidencing their names crafted in all capital or upper case letters. These designated political groups are “made” or created corporate citizens/employees and are as a matter of law, distinguished from natural persons.
A natural person, whose named spelled in upper and lower case letters i.e “Capitalized”, was born with unalienable rights, and is NOT as a matter of fact, a corporate U.S. citizen. Whereas, the artificial person, and corporate citizen of the United States, is displayed of its name in all capital letters. A natural born man or woman cannot be reduced to the condition of an artificial person.
The theme of the collective entity rule states: Brasswell v. United States 487 U.S. 99 (1988) quoting, United States v. White, 322 U.S. 694 (1944) But individuals, when acting as representatives of a collective group, cannot be said to be exercising their personal rights and duties, nor be entitled to their purely personal privileges. Rather they assume the rights, duties and privileges of the artificial entity or association of which they are agents or officers and they are bound by its obligations.
NOTE: The above cite as related to the “Collective Entity Rule” is prime material to confront any court, seeking to acquire personum jurisdiction over the natural person, while conducting the nature of the proceeding under said collective entity rule.
The biological individual/Man, is the only entity that can be termed, American Citizen.
A U.S. citizen as crafted, is an artificial person and by said persons nature, is a government officer, agent or employee.
14th Amendment. Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any States deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
A citizen of the United States is a constructive citizen, limited to a corporate status, created by the corporation entitled as the United States, and thereby, is acting as the agent for the purpose of collecting revenue. Said citizen can exercise only privileges and immunities as provided within the limited parameters of the 14th Amendment. A natural person however, is born with unalienable natural rights, which are secured by the Constitution. A constructive person restricted to the corporate status, could only receive corporate income.
The communist have done a great job in turning right wrong and wrong right! We are in a civil war and make no mistake the federal cops are the free peoples biggest enemy and their cops are nothing but fascist bell hops.
And THAT is why, when the excitement starts, they’re gonna get their butts handed to them.
Cops are the terrorists.
yea against muslims