Elections obviously have consequences, and one of those is manifested in the impact a president has on the makeup of the federal courts. When thinking about a president’s judicial nominations, attention typical is focused on the US Supreme Court since it makes the final decisions on matters of law. Yet, the district courts and appellate courts are very important as well, especially since not all cases appealed to the Supreme Court will be heard by that body, leaving the decision made by the lower court to stand as ruled.
Cases involving the Second Amendment are highly controversial, due largely to the entrenched interests on both side of the debate over an American’s right to keep and bear arms. Such a case has just been decided at the appellate court level, and the implications are serious. More on page two.
Must be LIBTARDS HANG
In this case the Appeals Court has stripped US Citizens of a right to self defense by labeling all that have trained and are licensed carriers of firearms as dangerous as criminals that carry firearms illegally. That ruling will be shown to be a horrendous and harmful ruling that must be fought all the way to the Supreme Court.
R u kidding me
Screw them
It’s coming soon sir. It’s closer now than it ever was.
Not carrying make you a target! Good example is gunfree zones as schools.
“… http://a.co/iTOQHPe and these elected representatives need to be returned home after a short term, in order that they should not make a rod unto themselves.”
So, is the police also “armed and dangerous”? Idiots!
A good majority of society is dangerous these days so whats your point? Crippleing law abiding people so they are unequal with those who choose to make them victims. Guess you can think this way whem its you who does not have to dwell with us peasants as Killary puts it. Go back to your little bubbles assholes AMD leave the laws alone.
Just remember if they start disarming the masses its because they have bigger plans in store for the masses and in the long run, your not part of that plan but an obstruction for a different agenda.