Elections obviously have consequences, and one of those is manifested in the impact a president has on the makeup of the federal courts. When thinking about a president’s judicial nominations, attention typical is focused on the US Supreme Court since it makes the final decisions on matters of law. Yet, the district courts and appellate courts are very important as well, especially since not all cases appealed to the Supreme Court will be heard by that body, leaving the decision made by the lower court to stand as ruled.
Cases involving the Second Amendment are highly controversial, due largely to the entrenched interests on both side of the debate over an American’s right to keep and bear arms. Such a case has just been decided at the appellate court level, and the implications are serious. More on page two.
Why wasn’t carrying a weapon 50 years ago a concern? The only reason to endlessly debate the Constitutionality of a guaranteed right, is to limit or end it. Leave it alone, we don’t want your One World Order.
Again trying to go against the constution ,why ,so you will be unable to protect ourselves,therefore easier to control ,easier to lead to slaughter something wrong in this corner
I call BS
Only to criminals, so in their eyes, since they’re criminals, yes.
What tree did these nuts fall out of.
Armed for sure. Dangerous only to someone threatening my family, friends or me.
Not every one that carries a gun is dangerous, some people carry gun to protect themselves from those who would want to hurt them
That’s a good thing
Who says we won’t
America is waiting for that day to see them arrested for treason
hmmm i wonder if that includes the police force