Elections obviously have consequences, and one of those is manifested in the impact a president has on the makeup of the federal courts. When thinking about a president’s judicial nominations, attention typical is focused on the US Supreme Court since it makes the final decisions on matters of law. Yet, the district courts and appellate courts are very important as well, especially since not all cases appealed to the Supreme Court will be heard by that body, leaving the decision made by the lower court to stand as ruled.
Cases involving the Second Amendment are highly controversial, due largely to the entrenched interests on both side of the debate over an American’s right to keep and bear arms. Such a case has just been decided at the appellate court level, and the implications are serious. More on page two.
Of course they are.
So…….the New Black Panthers & ISIS are going to be marked as being “dangerous”?
Unconstitutional. End of Memo!
Democrats on the bench.
Dangerous is a state of mind. If you are stupid enough to think you can do anything that comes into your feeble mind that is illegal, yes a CC is dangerous. Don’t do illegal$#%&!@*and you won’t have a problem.
Maybe the US Court of Appeals feels threatened because they have been part of the the faction trying to remove guns from law abiding Americans. They haven’t been able to do that. Could it be a guilty conscience?
Makes you safe period.
Wonder how many of these judges CARRY , or have Armed Security !
Carrying hate and contempt for other people makes a person dangerous. Carrying a gun makes a person able to defend against such a person.
,,,,no logic,,,only libatard parroting.