Elections obviously have consequences, and one of those is manifested in the impact a president has on the makeup of the federal courts. When thinking about a president’s judicial nominations, attention typical is focused on the US Supreme Court since it makes the final decisions on matters of law. Yet, the district courts and appellate courts are very important as well, especially since not all cases appealed to the Supreme Court will be heard by that body, leaving the decision made by the lower court to stand as ruled.
Cases involving the Second Amendment are highly controversial, due largely to the entrenched interests on both side of the debate over an American’s right to keep and bear arms. Such a case has just been decided at the appellate court level, and the implications are serious. More on page two.
Only because we can fight back!
Every judge and politician that goes against the constitution should be taken out and hung
Time to do away with judges that don’t follow the constitution
It’s true. Armed citizens ARE dangerous to suppression by a hostile government. This decision is a recognition by the courts that they have gone too far. This attack is important to allow these courts to strip us of ALL our God given rights.
So what’s with the full page Has me Advisor ad on second page? Screw that, I’m out
So are we thru with russia? Now its racist? Then homophobe….then islamaphobe….libtard idiot
Guess they want to see our law enforcement look ridiculous playing keep away with criminals like the British do.
That’s the whole point. Gun carriers are dangerous to those that would assault them! THE REAL TRUTH!!
Liberal troll alert!
It appears carrying a judge’s gavel may de dangerous to the citizenry, too.