Elections obviously have consequences, and one of those is manifested in the impact a president has on the makeup of the federal courts. When thinking about a president’s judicial nominations, attention typical is focused on the US Supreme Court since it makes the final decisions on matters of law. Yet, the district courts and appellate courts are very important as well, especially since not all cases appealed to the Supreme Court will be heard by that body, leaving the decision made by the lower court to stand as ruled.
Cases involving the Second Amendment are highly controversial, due largely to the entrenched interests on both side of the debate over an American’s right to keep and bear arms. Such a case has just been decided at the appellate court level, and the implications are serious. More on page two.
See? even our courts commit ‘Sedition’ bordering on ‘Treason under colour of law’.
Assholes who sit on a bench and make policy are realy dangerous
They are slowly taking our rights away
Carrying a gun make you dangerous as not carrying a gun makes you a victim. We should be allowed to make the choice.
Where would this mentality end? If I am chopping wood with an axe, have I lost my rights according to this kangaroo court? Pathetic rulings based on feeling’s have no place in a Court…
If you are a criminal it makes you
Dangerous and the government is not going to stop the bad guys from having guns
Any judges ruling opinion against the Constitution and Bill of Right should be removed from the bench. The 2nd Amendment is not debatable.
Of course a person carrying a gun CAN be dangerous, if required …..that’s why he or she is carrying the damned gun…..these are some realy brainy rulings you’ve come up with…..but, I guess that’s why you get the big bucks, huh?
Rick Woodruff
I am dangerous if my life is threatened..