Elections obviously have consequences, and one of those is manifested in the impact a president has on the makeup of the federal courts. When thinking about a president’s judicial nominations, attention typical is focused on the US Supreme Court since it makes the final decisions on matters of law. Yet, the district courts and appellate courts are very important as well, especially since not all cases appealed to the Supreme Court will be heard by that body, leaving the decision made by the lower court to stand as ruled.
Cases involving the Second Amendment are highly controversial, due largely to the entrenched interests on both side of the debate over an American’s right to keep and bear arms. Such a case has just been decided at the appellate court level, and the implications are serious. More on page two.
A danger to criminals!
The right to bear arms does not limit arms to firearms at the time of writing crossbows and bows and sword were also arms and should be covered by the 2nd so does possession of those make me dangerous
My guess is that, this ruleing should be enforced against all Federal , State ,and local poolice agencys also.
We are dangerous…to criminals and tyrants.
Remember: don’t fight LEO in the streets. If they violate your rights fight them in the courts. You stay alive, they stay alive and you might get a fat check.
Am I also considered dangerous when I am operating a vehicle or carrying a chainsaw?
That is just stupid you want to take our guns so we can have our 2nd Amendment right we will show you differently
Hell we drive around with assault rifles in the back seat bullets everywhere thousand rounds of ammunition AK-47 s deer rifles shotguns pistols everybody gets along just fine..
Sure could if anyone gets more ignorant.
You’re fukkin’ right I’m dangerous.