Elections obviously have consequences, and one of those is manifested in the impact a president has on the makeup of the federal courts. When thinking about a president’s judicial nominations, attention typical is focused on the US Supreme Court since it makes the final decisions on matters of law. Yet, the district courts and appellate courts are very important as well, especially since not all cases appealed to the Supreme Court will be heard by that body, leaving the decision made by the lower court to stand as ruled.
Cases involving the Second Amendment are highly controversial, due largely to the entrenched interests on both side of the debate over an American’s right to keep and bear arms. Such a case has just been decided at the appellate court level, and the implications are serious. More on page two.
You had better believe carrying a firearm makes me dangerous. I am dangerous to those who would try to harm me or my family. I am dangerous to anyone threatening a law enforcement officer. I am dangerous to one that would beat an elderly Pearson or a a child. I am dangerous to the thugs amongst us. I am no danger to the law abiding. I am no danger to those who do not attack me. I am no danger to the public. If you attack me or an officer, an innocent person, I am very very dangerous.
They’re wrong. Very wrong. My tongue is much much more dangerous.
Yes to Criminals, DUMNASS!
Stupidity
Judges are only there to uphold the law & our constitution. Anything other then that, fire them.
Mitch Rader you are right on , Thank you !!!!
Judges who manifest their stupidity make a laughing stock of our entire legal system.
Then thay won’t need armed guards at the court house because thay are dangerous
Another BAD RULING BY an APPEALS COURT. – AMEN
its good logic