The United Nationals Human Rights Council (UNHRC) has issued a report critical of the United States practice of detaining would-be immigrants to determine their appropriate status.
What makes this news ironic is that some of the Council members are hardly shining lights of liberty. But its work is typical of the “open borders” bias that infects the United Nations and other globalist organizations as a whole.
For some reason, the fact that the United States still wants to maintain some semblance of sovereignty is offensive to many in the world community today. Considering all the possible places that asylum seekers and refugees would want to go, the good old USA would be at the very top of the list.
On the next page, learn more about some of the Council members and their gross hypocrisy in attacking U.S. human rights and immigration policies. Find out UNHRC’s specific complaints, and how they run counter to common sense.
“Would Be” is not legal. BTW why haven’t any of the surrounding Arab nations taken in any of these Syrian and African refugees???!!!
They can tell the UN that we are The United States of America and as such are not Governed by the UN! The UN Panel can take their demands and hold them till Hell Freezes Over!
They can tell the UN that we are The United States of America and as such are not Governed by the UN! The UN Panel can take their demands and hold them till Hell Freezes Over!
Deport all illegal immigrants now
THROW THE UN OUT OF THE US
STOP ALL FUNDING
just deport them
The UN can ‘demand’ all they want, their collective opinion means absolutely nothing! There is a new sheriff in town, meaning no more business as usual! Ain’t life such a$#%&!@* LOL!
Tell the U.N. to FO&D!
You take them
Good for you IN, NEVER CAVE TO THE UGLY, ZIONIST, IMPERIALIST USA OF CORRUPTION AND HYPOCRISY!!!