The United Nationals Human Rights Council (UNHRC) has issued a report critical of the United States practice of detaining would-be immigrants to determine their appropriate status.
What makes this news ironic is that some of the Council members are hardly shining lights of liberty. But its work is typical of the “open borders” bias that infects the United Nations and other globalist organizations as a whole.
For some reason, the fact that the United States still wants to maintain some semblance of sovereignty is offensive to many in the world community today. Considering all the possible places that asylum seekers and refugees would want to go, the good old USA would be at the very top of the list.
On the next page, learn more about some of the Council members and their gross hypocrisy in attacking U.S. human rights and immigration policies. Find out UNHRC’s specific complaints, and how they run counter to common sense.
U.N. get out.
If they where worth a F’,they’d do the obvious right thing to do and help get them back to they’re land and help them there
No
no to the UN
They have a country, stay there and fix it instead of decimating it!
Time for them to go. They serve no purpose. It’s a waste of our money which would be better used on American citizens
Stupid U.N. has no jurisdiction in our country!! If we pull out of it, there goes the vast majority of their funding!! I say we get out of that!!
L
We American’s demand that that the UN IS THROWN OUT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NOW.
Immigrants and illegals are 2 different things