The United Nationals Human Rights Council (UNHRC) has issued a report critical of the United States practice of detaining would-be immigrants to determine their appropriate status.
What makes this news ironic is that some of the Council members are hardly shining lights of liberty. But its work is typical of the “open borders” bias that infects the United Nations and other globalist organizations as a whole.
For some reason, the fact that the United States still wants to maintain some semblance of sovereignty is offensive to many in the world community today. Considering all the possible places that asylum seekers and refugees would want to go, the good old USA would be at the very top of the list.
On the next page, learn more about some of the Council members and their gross hypocrisy in attacking U.S. human rights and immigration policies. Find out UNHRC’s specific complaints, and how they run counter to common sense.
how about no you don’t control us.
Who cares what this antiquated body wants.
Hippocrates!
Forwarded
There is absolutely no reason the U.N. cant set up safe zone’s in refugee’s home country’s….and keep them there….That’s what the U.N. is there for…not dictating to other countrys how they should accept “IMMIGRANT’S” that hate us an have no intention’s of assimilating ….
Your not in any position to
Demand$#%&!@*
They can demand all they want but they’re not going to get it!
We don’t want to be in the UN any more
Send this group out of the US. They serve no purpose here.
Exit the UN
No.