In yet another huge blow to our Constitution, the Supreme Court ruled in Jan 2015 that a police officer can violate your 4th Amendment rights if they make a ‘reasonable’ mistake regarding the law.
If you are ignorant of the law, that is no excuse, but if a cop is ignorant of the law, he can violate your rights.
As incredible as it sounds, any cop can ‘play dumb’ and proceed to do anything he wants to you and feel secure that his excuse of ignorance will shield him.
How in the hell can a cop be expected to uphold the law if he doesn’t even know the law?
SEE PAGE 2 TO CONTINUE:
I thought ignorance of the law is no excuse? Oh yea, that is different.
I thought IGNORANCE OF THE LAW WAS NO EXCUSE!!!!
Looks like $#%&!@* germany
The communist-Democratic Party of The United states of America,Founded in 1900’s in Hollywood by Woodrow Wilson progressive party,Controlled Party pushed this through when obamacare was pushed through which no congressman or congresswomen read a word of.
Wrong!!!!!
Igornance is no excuse of the law, cops should not have jobs if they don’t know the laws
The Fourth Amendment (Amendment IV) to the United States Cons$#%&!@*ution is the part of the Bill of Rights that prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause. It was adopted in response to the abuse of the writ of $#%&!@*istance, a type of general search warrant issued by the British government and a major source of tension in pre-Revolutionary America. The Fourth Amendment was introduced in Congress in 1789 by James Madison, along with the other amendments in the Bill of Rights, in response to Anti-Federalist objections to the new Cons$#%&!@*ution. Congress submitted the amendment to the states on September 28, 1789. By December 15, 1791, the necessary three-quarters of the states had ratified it. On March 1, 1792, Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson announced the adoption of the amendment.
Because the Bill of Rights did not initially apply to the states, and federal criminal investigations were less common in the first century of the nation’s history, there is little significant case law for the Fourth Amendment before the 20th century. The amendment was held to apply to the states in Mapp v. Ohio (1961).
Under the Fourth Amendment, search and seizure (including arrest) should be limited in scope according to specific information supplied to the issuing court, usually by a law enforcement officer who has sworn by it. Fourth Amendment case law deals with three central questions: what government activities cons$#%&!@*ute “search” and “seizure”; what cons$#%&!@*utes probable cause for these actions; and how violations of Fourth Amendment rights should be addressed. Early court decisions limited the amendment’s scope to a law enforcement officer’s physical intrusion onto private property, but with Katz v. United States (1967), the Supreme Court held that its protections, such as the warrant requirement, extend to the privacy of individuals as well as physical locations. Law enforcement officers need a warrant for most search and seizure activities, but the Court has defined a series of exceptions for consent searches, motor vehicle searches, evidence in plain view, exigent cir$#%&!@*stances, border searches, and other situations.
If the cops don’t know the law then what the heck are they doing on the police force? The supreme court sounds like they have a bunch of idiots on the bench. Oh, my bad, aren’t they “CLOSE” to the whitehouse???
Say is the SCOTUNDER SATANIC AUTHORITY going to Save you at the Great White Throne, and you Rich SCJ James 5:1 – 7 How do you Plead ? for the Saving of you Soul. HYHY Liberator or Terminator by Personal Choice, http://truth-revealed.name Your Life to the List Galatians 5:19-21King James Version (KJV)
19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
Are they even real cops ???