Rashness and cowardice are both to be avoided. The first gets you involved in conflicts that can be disasters, and the second invites aggressive parties to attack you. It can be argued that Obama’s actions in the Middle East have been rash, and when he fails to act when his self-proclaimed “red lines” are violated, this gives the appearance of cowardice. This is not a successful foreign policy.
Threatening Russia with military action is very serious business. This is nuclear-armed Russia, not Libya or some third-world country. But making such threats is just what the State Department is doing. All over U.S. policy regarding Syria and U.S. “interests” in the Middle-East.
What is the real reasons for our actions in the Middle-East? Could this be a very dangerous attempt to create a conflict that would distract the electorate enough to enable a Clinton victory? Or keep Obama in office? Those are despicable thoughts if there ever was one.
We’ll let you consider these possibilities and more as you watch the following interview.
Source: RT
Full exchange:
Ido feel like if Russia was not a white nation they would be safe Obama…. Something big is Obamas agenda.