“If somebody goes over and they want to fight for ISIS, they wouldn’t be coming back,” said Trump to Stuart Varney, when asked what he would do if he were President.
Varney, referring to how Britain has recently revoked passports and closed mosques, questioned if Trump would be willing to do the same thing.
“Well I don’t know,” Trump said. “I mean, I haven’t heard about the closing of the mosque. It depends, if the mosque is, you know, loaded for bear, I don’t know. You’re going to have to certainly look at it.”
“But I can tell you one thing,” Trump said. “If somebody goes over and they want to fight for ISIS, they wouldn’t be coming back.”
Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) responded:
“Donald Trump is talking before he knows what he’s talking about,” King said. “I have been critical of people in the Muslim community, but the fact is you can’t be shutting down mosques.”
King said the U.S. should have surveillance of mosques to find out “if there’s activity in that mosque, where there’s weapons or if there’s actual conspiracy going on. Then yes you can take action. But to be casually, the way Donald Trump seems to be talking about shutting down mosques? No.”
Religious freedom and protecting the American people from an ideology that has called for her demise is a difficult balancing act that sadly may one day need to be addressed. Learning from the mistakes of other nations and putting reasonable protections in place may be the only way to ultimately keep ISIS from reeking deadly havoc in our nation.
What say you?
https://youtu.be/qbsFkEABJbM
Source: Washington Post
Susan Moon Oh no you can’t fuzznuts. Have you ever heard of the Constitution?
What part of Freedom of Religion confuses you teabagger?
yes…straight to hell
Don’t consider just do it All of them
Holy c**p you idiots are incredible. What part of FREEDOM OF RELIGION confuses you imbeciles?
i only teabag on call of duty
i only t bag on call of duty
Roger, by your name calling you passed up an opportunity to make your case. Susan, if you begin by calling a segment of the population a threat based on their Religion, (I do not disagree Islam is a threat), then no one is truly safe. For instance, who makes the determination that a certain segment of the population is a threat? Or what criteria will be used to make the determination? It will be a Pandora’s Box given the U.S. Constitution fails to define what is the True Religion….
TEAR THEM ALL DOWN AND DEPORT ALL RADICALS