Greg Littell, writing for a Western Nevada journal called “The Union,” has said in a op-ed article that the idea of armed rebellion against a tyrannical United States would be impossible because of a perceived weapons disparity. Essentially, Mr. Littell believes that a militia conceivably armed with AR-15s would be forced to back down because this tyrant could threaten to use nuclear weapons. Therefore, the only “rational course” to take would be Gandhi-esque civil disobedience and that refusing to work would grind the tyrannical government to a halt. Let’s back up a little and really analyze what Mr. Littell is saying.
First of all, let’s not be Polly-Annish about this. Barack Obama has already enforced his will on federal and state governments repeatedly in order to instill his liberal agenda on the American citizen. Between stuffing Syrian “refugees” into whatever corners of America will take them, attacking our Second Amendment rights, and repressing Christian Americans, Obama could already be called something of a tyrant. All that really remains between Barack Obama leaving office in 2016 and Barack Obama becoming President-For-Life is the support of the military. However, Obama has repeatedly slandered military leaders and attacked military establishments and traditions, so it is safe to assume the military would not back an Obama-led dictatorship. Any overtures of retaining his Presidency after the end of his office term would be quashed by the dutiful generals who serve on behalf of the American people.
Secondly, why would soldiers launch nukes on their own homes? Greg Littell is laboring under a literary fantasy more befitting a Tom Clancy novel than domestic politics. Mr. Littell’s genocidal fantasy may work for his own whims to quash Obama-dissenters, but fails to consider that the men behind the button are better Americans than he is and would be unwilling to act so coldly on their own families. One wonders what Mr. Littell imagines he would do?
Let’s accept the scenario Mr. Littell has given us. What would you do if Obama wrested control of the military, enacted martial law and you’ve taken up arms to cast him out of power? If this is the case, how would patriots get around federal maneuvers to launch nuclear missiles on American cities?
Read out more about Greg Littell’s article and a counterpoint on page 2.
evil has taken control of this world….the devil has a short time to deceive the people….remember people JESUS WINS AT THE END TIMES….YES there will be chaos every where..the bible calls it the beast…it growing…but only a short time..
There has been talk in certain circles about how it would all go down . Like storming prisons to recruit,storm the news rooms,cut off Communications ect,ect
Its not called armed rebellion is called taking back a corrupt government.
We will do what we have to do! Start by eliminating all “Falal Foods”! Only criminals cover their faces!
Going to happen
It’s really very simple to me. Take shelter until the radiation has settled and then The 300 million armed Americans , (that no army In the world could defeat ) And then take back our government. Pretty simple in my mind. And by the way , It would be impossible for Obama to declare marital law. Because of the size of the Country and the amount of citizens (300 million ) with weapons of all ranges. Anyone can make a semi-automatic into a fully automatic weapon. And the countless or weapons available seen in you-tube videos put out by Americans.
WWIII
Truth
United Nations needs to be abolished, very corrupt!
Yeah buddy and all support from the citizens to protect them if they were to go to jail. We’d accidently break them out. And oops loose them in the mix. No American soldier or otherwise is going to go against his country or its citizens.