Greg Littell, writing for a Western Nevada journal called “The Union,” has said in a op-ed article that the idea of armed rebellion against a tyrannical United States would be impossible because of a perceived weapons disparity. Essentially, Mr. Littell believes that a militia conceivably armed with AR-15s would be forced to back down because this tyrant could threaten to use nuclear weapons. Therefore, the only “rational course” to take would be Gandhi-esque civil disobedience and that refusing to work would grind the tyrannical government to a halt. Let’s back up a little and really analyze what Mr. Littell is saying.
First of all, let’s not be Polly-Annish about this. Barack Obama has already enforced his will on federal and state governments repeatedly in order to instill his liberal agenda on the American citizen. Between stuffing Syrian “refugees” into whatever corners of America will take them, attacking our Second Amendment rights, and repressing Christian Americans, Obama could already be called something of a tyrant. All that really remains between Barack Obama leaving office in 2016 and Barack Obama becoming President-For-Life is the support of the military. However, Obama has repeatedly slandered military leaders and attacked military establishments and traditions, so it is safe to assume the military would not back an Obama-led dictatorship. Any overtures of retaining his Presidency after the end of his office term would be quashed by the dutiful generals who serve on behalf of the American people.
Secondly, why would soldiers launch nukes on their own homes? Greg Littell is laboring under a literary fantasy more befitting a Tom Clancy novel than domestic politics. Mr. Littell’s genocidal fantasy may work for his own whims to quash Obama-dissenters, but fails to consider that the men behind the button are better Americans than he is and would be unwilling to act so coldly on their own families. One wonders what Mr. Littell imagines he would do?
Let’s accept the scenario Mr. Littell has given us. What would you do if Obama wrested control of the military, enacted martial law and you’ve taken up arms to cast him out of power? If this is the case, how would patriots get around federal maneuvers to launch nuclear missiles on American cities?
Read out more about Greg Littell’s article and a counterpoint on page 2.
Mick Loros says: Only if it is for the American people. The normal citizens of this country who have been dumped on by the Elite.
Obama against the White folks thats what it looks like America.
So far since yesterday I’ve seen 5 different article’s like this. Ever wonder if maybe this is just what the government wants you to do?
Actually Willie nearly half of the black community is against Obama and they are also targets as well Latinos community as well.
I’d hate to bloody up those pretty UN Uniforms. MOLON LABE!
The Muslims are way out gunned and beat Russia and has us fighting over 10 years now with ak47s and homemade bombs
Obama is anti-christ, he wants to turn America away from God any way he can.
So ?
As Instructed by fellow American,
Coach Mike Ditka,
Al Jazeera, ISIS, Radical Mooslims
are BULLCORN.
AGREED, COACH!
Nuff said.
I’ll be first in line you try to harm my family or my kind if your for America your on my side if your not you better duck and hide
Don’t underestimate over 15 million veterans, the UN will never get ashore let alone take over this country. Most of the military would side with the people if it ever came to that. Some would go with OBOZO but they wouldn’t last long. They would be fragged pretty quickly!!