Greg Littell, writing for a Western Nevada journal called “The Union,” has said in a op-ed article that the idea of armed rebellion against a tyrannical United States would be impossible because of a perceived weapons disparity. Essentially, Mr. Littell believes that a militia conceivably armed with AR-15s would be forced to back down because this tyrant could threaten to use nuclear weapons. Therefore, the only “rational course” to take would be Gandhi-esque civil disobedience and that refusing to work would grind the tyrannical government to a halt. Let’s back up a little and really analyze what Mr. Littell is saying.
First of all, let’s not be Polly-Annish about this. Barack Obama has already enforced his will on federal and state governments repeatedly in order to instill his liberal agenda on the American citizen. Between stuffing Syrian “refugees” into whatever corners of America will take them, attacking our Second Amendment rights, and repressing Christian Americans, Obama could already be called something of a tyrant. All that really remains between Barack Obama leaving office in 2016 and Barack Obama becoming President-For-Life is the support of the military. However, Obama has repeatedly slandered military leaders and attacked military establishments and traditions, so it is safe to assume the military would not back an Obama-led dictatorship. Any overtures of retaining his Presidency after the end of his office term would be quashed by the dutiful generals who serve on behalf of the American people.
Secondly, why would soldiers launch nukes on their own homes? Greg Littell is laboring under a literary fantasy more befitting a Tom Clancy novel than domestic politics. Mr. Littell’s genocidal fantasy may work for his own whims to quash Obama-dissenters, but fails to consider that the men behind the button are better Americans than he is and would be unwilling to act so coldly on their own families. One wonders what Mr. Littell imagines he would do?
Let’s accept the scenario Mr. Littell has given us. What would you do if Obama wrested control of the military, enacted martial law and you’ve taken up arms to cast him out of power? If this is the case, how would patriots get around federal maneuvers to launch nuclear missiles on American cities?
Read out more about Greg Littell’s article and a counterpoint on page 2.
Why else do you think all these false flag shootings are happening? The traitor in the W house wants to disarm citizens so they can’t fight back fairly. God help this nation!
May God protect your son. I think most of the talk of armed insurrection is just that, talk. As I told one of our company drivers who said he couldn’t wait for it to begin, do you have any idea what your talking about and the consequences? He said the constitution said we have to. I told him to read it. Not just listen to someone’s weird interpretation
When they come they will be the refugees 0boms orphans. They are the new military.
It took only 7 years to bring the USA down. People we need to REGROUP!
0bom is lieing Again::: It states in the NATIONALITY ACT Passed June 27 1952, Law # 414
Chapter 2
Section 212
That the USA does not have to accept any Refugees who have an interest in OverthrowIng our Government. So yes he is lieing AGAIN
I eish our best military minds would start up a defence plan NOW. 0bom is bringing in his muslim armys as we sit on our a $$ e $. Where & when? We will be there!!!
He over rides laws on immigration and put out stand down orders on border patrol. He has an open range in Washington. We have Cowards in the House and Congress..Laws are a joke right now..
I, a citizen of The UNITED STATES of AMERICA, am calling for the immediate arrest and trial of Barack Hussein Obama for treason, under Article 3 section 3 of the United States Constitution, for aiding and giving comfort to our enemies. If you agree, please copy and re-post.
Let’s go!!…
Our military is sworn to US FIRST and will NEVER turn on US no matter who orders them to do so!!!!….