So, it turns out that your government has deemed it necessary to begin microchipping people who are determined unable to provide sound decisions on their own behalf and, therefore, the chipping will be initiated to assist those who know better than us to “mind” them and ensure that they are not a threat to themselves or others.
This horror movie gets even scarier. There is already a law on the books that potentially allows human beings to be forcibly chipped.
Oh, it’s couched in warm, fuzzy language and they say it’s just to help keep track of folks with Alzheimer’s or other developmental disabilities, but remember that the most unpatriotic law ever passed was also called the Patriot Act.
H.R.4919 was passed in 2016.
It directs the Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) to award competitive grants to health care, law enforcement, or public safety agencies, and nonprofit organizations, to develop or operate locally based proactive programs to prevent wandering and locate missing individuals with dementia or children with developmental disabilities. The BJA must give preference to law enforcement or public safety agencies partnering with nonprofit organizations that use person-centered plans and are directly linked to individuals, and families of individuals, with dementia or developmental disabilities.
Despite the fact that the bill requires everyone to use privacy “best practices,” it’s not that much of a stretch to see what a slippery slope this is. Who gets to decide whether a person “needs” to be chipped for their own good? Law enforcement. Scary.
This is the ultimate endgame, though. Think about the very last thing that government is able to control. The human mind stands up for reason, sanity, common sense and liberty. A new discussion being argued is regarding this very concept. Do we truly have a right to our own thoughts? Is there such a thing as “cognitive liberty?” In other words, should thoughts be considered personal, or should they be opened up (through new technologies like chipping) to the possibility of being accountable forms of “speech?”
This slippery slope gets even slipperier when you start to consider that any thought in your head, however fleeting, could theoretically be “held against you” in a court of law. “I wish I could just punch him in the face!” now would be considered as a physical threat, even though you never followed through with this thought. The modern court would resemble something right out of some Orwellian future where “thoughtcrimes” become the mechanism for locking people up, or more importantly, shutting down revolutionary tendencies. A citizen repressed is a good, productive member of society, after all.
Of course, this would necessarily lead to the complete disappearance of privacy in any way, shape or form.
“In the year 3535,
Ain’t gonna need to tell the truth, tell no lie,
Everything you think, do and say,
Is in the pill you took today…”
In the Year 2525, Zager & Evans (1969)
Could this lead to a cashless society?
If “everyone” is getting microchipped like these experts predict, that could be the next step in the push toward a cashless society. Think about the lack of privacy then. If everything is purchased via a chip unique to you, then no purchases could be under the radar. Whether a person was stocking up on food, watching X-rated movies, reading books on revolution, or buying ammo, it would all be recorded in a database. Our purchases could be used in some kind of pre-crime technology, ala Minority Report, or they could be used to profile us in other ways.
If there is no way to make purchases but with a chip, many people will have to reluctantly comply. The same chips could be a requirement for medical care, driver’s licenses, jobs – you name it. No matter where you tried to hide, your GPS locator would mean that you would be found. It would be like everyone being forced to have one of those ankle bracelets that criminals wear, except it would be inside your body.
If you think the atmosphere of control is unnerving now, just wait. When everyone is microchipped, the net will be even tighter.
At the end of the day, will neuro-Eugenics be the outcome. The Progressives at the turn of the last century made the demonic decision to begin to “weed out” certain “undesirable” members of society through forced sterilization and abortions. Margaret Sanger who helped institute the Planned Parenthood baby-killing factories throughout the inner cities of the United States, particularly in African-American neighborhoods, did so to whittle down the Black population to a point where they would soon disappear. Not quite achieving those means, the Left then saw an opportunity of a different sort of mind control by renaming the advocacy of killing the unborn as Pro-Choice in an effort to keep the African-American under their thumb and its population under control.
They achieved this to a certain extent. The biggest threat to the African-American child to this day is the womb of its mother. This sinister and disgusting practice is the most prolific killer of babies in the Black community, but is never talked about or referred to in any constructive or instructive way.
The Left also used Eugenics to weed out the infirm, the mentally unstable or corrupted, and the poverty-stricken. There are countless examples of women who were raped, but who were poor, who were subjected to being put into institutions and forcibly sterilized because of the possibility that they would procreate.
Will this type of Eugenics methodology be extended to the mind and our thoughts? You can bet on that. Nothing that the government or the NWO ever touches is for the purposes of enlightenment or furthering the human condition.
Make note of this, do your own research, and remain on alert.
Source: The Organic Prepper / WRAL.com
Image: Antinewsnetwork
The people who are lining up to get these…
Obviously have never read the bible.
SMH; liberals