The Supreme Court in a unanimous 9-0 vote strengthened the law that states if someone is found guilty of domestic violence, even if no actual violence was proved, they can’t own a gun.
What part of ‘shall not be infringed’ regarding the 2nd Amendment do these ‘justices’ not understand?
To take someone’s gun because they have been involved in domestic violence will NOT stop domestic violence from occurring in the future.
These 2 issues are not related in any way.
See Page 2 For Complete Story:
wishful thinking!!!!!
The hell with the SUPREME court. 2nd Amendment rights gives the Right to Bare arms. No Law made can change that. Read the BILL of Rights and the Constitution. Its Illegal.
SOMEDAY WE WILL BE ABLE TO FIX THIS.
Now obama and holder have to figure out how they can make everybody into a domestic violence case.
MOLON LABE….supreme justices my ass
Morne BULL$#%&!@*!!
http://youtu.be/DVCh5Jg3DfY
I’m conflicted on this one. I’m not a fan of domestic violence. And criminals don’t need guns.
No matter the vote, the courts are NOT empowered to change the constitution on their own say so….HELL NO, we will ALWAYS have our guns, and we’ll take yours if you attack us!
Cops have a PROVED history of DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, assault, rape and murder, and these RETARDS think THEY rule over us….GET A DAMN BRAIN!