The Supreme Court in a unanimous 9-0 vote strengthened the law that states if someone is found guilty of domestic violence, even if no actual violence was proved, they can’t own a gun.
What part of ‘shall not be infringed’ regarding the 2nd Amendment do these ‘justices’ not understand?
To take someone’s gun because they have been involved in domestic violence will NOT stop domestic violence from occurring in the future.
These 2 issues are not related in any way.
See Page 2 For Complete Story:
No problem, I think if you’re convicted of ANY violent crime, no guns, period.
Oh yeah, they should cut your f***ing hands off too, so you can never do it again.
Mori Lemau
What’s domestic Violence these days? Not necessarily Physical Violence! I don’t give a rats azz who says you can’t God says you can! Build one! 😉
Domestic Violence these days is a loud arguement! Sounds like they literally wish take guns doesn’t it? It’s an Inalienable Right and God is above the Supreme Court! 😉
Hey yall better dig out the other ones! Lol
http://www.truthandaction.org/interesting-declaration-war-federal-government/
What part of well regulated don’t YOU get?
Such B.S! Do you know how many men are accused falsely of domestic violence with no proof everyday. I do not condone domestic violence, but the pendulum has swung way too far in the wrong direction!
P**s on them we will just ignore these libatard bastards and go by the Constitutiona of the united States the 2nd plainly states it shall not be infringed and it is not going to be so saith the Patriots