The Supreme Court in a unanimous 9-0 vote strengthened the law that states if someone is found guilty of domestic violence, even if no actual violence was proved, they can’t own a gun.
What part of ‘shall not be infringed’ regarding the 2nd Amendment do these ‘justices’ not understand?
To take someone’s gun because they have been involved in domestic violence will NOT stop domestic violence from occurring in the future.
These 2 issues are not related in any way.
See Page 2 For Complete Story:
more paid off morons. This is a prime example of being paid to make up c**p.
Guess they figure since they are the “Supreme” court they have more intelligence than anybody else. That’s another government oxymoron–Supreme and court.
just an excuse to disarm the citizenry. fart in public? OH NOOES! contributing to global bs warming / climate change – take their gun!
The problem lies with the definition of domestic violence which could be constructed by government as a means to disarm those who are anti government.
Gosh, Any excuse. 🙁
So can the victim of domestic violence own a gun?
told ya…this court will take away our rights….with kagan and sotomayor and ginsberg, we have no chance to continue life as we knew it. i have no clue what happened to the men, but maybe they are senile? so disappointed in scalia
THE SUPREME COURT MUST BE MUSLIM CONTROLLED ALSO. THIS IS A SAD DAY.
Term limits for these people and let us vote them to positions
The Supreme Court is bought and paid for! Term limits for all!!!!