The Supreme Court in a unanimous 9-0 vote strengthened the law that states if someone is found guilty of domestic violence, even if no actual violence was proved, they can’t own a gun.
What part of ‘shall not be infringed’ regarding the 2nd Amendment do these ‘justices’ not understand?
To take someone’s gun because they have been involved in domestic violence will NOT stop domestic violence from occurring in the future.
These 2 issues are not related in any way.
See Page 2 For Complete Story:
is this why obama is taking weapons away from the military
no wonder we have such violence in our culture! You would allow an abuser a gun ?
Dismantle the Supreme Court and start again!
I agree with this wholeheartedly! Here in OR, when you fill out a form to purchase a weapon, you are asked if you have been charged with domestic violence. You will be denied if you have. It is a proven fact that if an abusive boyfriend or husband gets ahold of a gun he is very likely to use it against his partner.
Abuse it, you lose it! Choices have consequences
don’t no
And there is the Dragonion “Violence Against Women Act” which is a complete LIE and Takes away every MAN’S rights in a Courtroom. Judges and Lawyers are paid UNDER THE TABLE to prosecute any and every MAN that takes a woman to court!!! Worse yet 3.8 MILLION men since 1996 have been charged with domestic abuse under this Law and the man didn’t do anything!! False accusations is the name of this game!!!
well in the first place no Felon can Cary any kind of fire arm. all they seem to be doing is Re affiirming that law
THEY SHOULD TAKE DOCTOR’S HANDS, WHEN THEY COMMIT ABORTIONS.
I think the justice system in domestic violence cases tend to favor the women even if it means not investigating just going along with whatever she says. Just how I see things, men are victims also.