The Supreme Court in a unanimous 9-0 vote strengthened the law that states if someone is found guilty of domestic violence, even if no actual violence was proved, they can’t own a gun.
What part of ‘shall not be infringed’ regarding the 2nd Amendment do these ‘justices’ not understand?
To take someone’s gun because they have been involved in domestic violence will NOT stop domestic violence from occurring in the future.
These 2 issues are not related in any way.
See Page 2 For Complete Story:
This Supreme Court is a joke. They think they are in Congress and are there to make law. Wrong!
gun for us sane people 1.0000000000000000000000000000,00000000000000000000000000 lol.
MAKES NO SENSE…BUT THEN NOTHNG DOES ANYMORE
But the real criminals can have guns!
What about policemen who beat their wives , just saying.
Oscar Pistorius was never once involved with domestic violence with his wife but he killed his wife with a gun. Makes one wonder if this is the correct decision. People involved in domestic violence don’t need their guns taken away, they need to be put into rehabilitation programs, or fined, or arrested/jailed, or both fined and jailed and a rehab program.
The Supreme Court is even a BIT sorrier than OBUMMER is !!!!!!
Better tell that to the batterers! I’m sure they’ll listen!
This is just more proof that the political hack morons on this Obama kangaroo court have never even heard of the United States Constitution, let alone even read it!
THERE SHALL BE ‘NO INFRINGEMENT” Find another way to deal with it.