The U.S. Supreme Court has just green-lit law enforcement officers to enter American homes without a warrant.
At least there was some dissent; Justice Alito wrote about the 6-3 decision that, “When occupants of a residence disagree on whether they will admit police without a warrant, the objecting occupant must be physically present. That doesn’t change if police have removed the objector…”
Just turn that over in your mind for a moment and you can start to see how truly dangerous a precedent that is!
Read page 2 for background on the case and ruling:
That is illegal , I can see alot of cops getting killed trying this ! Hey guys , you are being set up !
BUY AMO
no not fire them … put them in front of a firing squad this should take care of their problems…
Let me get this straight … it was the three “liberal” justices who opposed the decision???? And “Ginsburg quoted the late Justice Robert J. Jackson’s observation that the warrant requirement ranks among the “fundamental distinctions between our form of government, where officers are under the law, and the police-state where they are the law.”
It was the more conservative justices who carried the 6-3 decision. Look at who dissented/disagreed!
Give credit to Ginsburg, Kagan and Sotomayor for opposing this decision and upholding the Constitution.
Interestingly the Obama appointees opposed this decision. Get a load of who were on the prevailing 6-3 decision.
Carol, the Obama appointees opposed this decision! Look who favored it, 6-3!
Ishmael, the Obama appointees opposed this decision. Your beef is with the so-called conservative judges. Hmmmm. Wonder who appointed them?
oathbreakers