The U.S. Supreme Court has just green-lit law enforcement officers to enter American homes without a warrant.
At least there was some dissent; Justice Alito wrote about the 6-3 decision that, “When occupants of a residence disagree on whether they will admit police without a warrant, the objecting occupant must be physically present. That doesn’t change if police have removed the objector…”
Just turn that over in your mind for a moment and you can start to see how truly dangerous a precedent that is!
Read page 2 for background on the case and ruling:
not in my house without a warrent. SC must mean there houses
It is unconstitutional and sc should be removed and only elected by the people!!!!
who’s houses?
Constitution getting ripped up more by the day
The bill of rights now consists of 9 amendments, 1,2,3 5-10? Oh wait, no 10the amendment, so that leaves 8, MAYBE
Truth and action has had a history of reporting partial truths. I will read the ruling instead of believing this frivolous claim
It appears its a case where a party in the household consented and another did not. Tricky. Does open doors to future cases but does not authorize a unilateral no for entry.
Well the government doesn’t care the Patriot act made this legal Patricia Whitehead the only way to get rid of it is to repeal the Patriot act
No Dennis I’m sorry to inform you but warrantless searches were made legal when they passed the Patriot act
I looked at the ruling and not this propaganda of article, while I agree the supreme court has been out of line. Search without warrant is a staple in the Constitution