A 2014 study revealed that Obama has broken upwards of 2000 laws since 2012 alone – and due to a loophole in the system neither Congress nor or our judiciary branch can do anything about it.
When our president publishes a regulation it is supposed to be looked over by Congress to be validated or not. But because Obama has simply not submitted his published regulations to Congress since the beginning of 2012, anything he’s published can’t be reviewed. Add to that the fact that Congress has barred judicial review of these regulations and you have a president that simply publishes what he wants without oversight.
See More Next Page:
HE KNEW THAT
Lets be clear………
Yes we should Thomas, but who the hell is willing to stand up for American citizens, obviously no one in government. What is he holding over everyone or what are they afraid of? the Muslim brotherhood?
Study: Obama Has Technically Broken 2000 Laws Since 2012 A recent study has revealed that Obama has broken upwards of 2000 laws since 2012 alone – and due to a loophole in the system neither Congress or our judiciary branch can do anything about it. When our president publishes a regulation it is supposed to be looked over by Congress to be validated or not. But because Obama has simply not submitted his published regulations to Congress since the beginning of 2012, anything he’s published can’t be reviewed. Add to that the fact that Congress has barred judicial review of these regulations and you have a president that simply publishes what he wants without oversight. Some of these rules are minor, like how wheelchairs should be stowed aboard aircraft, while others are more serious, like which bodies of water deserve federal protection, i.e., which bodies of water the EPA can seize or at least fine you for on your own property should you violate their rules.
The situation illustrates the obscure, byzantine process used to create federal regulations — and how easily it can go awry.
“It’s pretty apparent that the system is broken,” said Curtis Copeland, a retired Congressional Research Service staffer who discovered the issue. “It would seem this is one area where congressional Republicans and Democrats could get together and say: ‘This is crazy. We can fix this.’ ” Under a 1996 statute, most federal rules are supposed to be reported to the House and Senate in paper form and to the Government Accountability Office electronically. But since the start of 2012, that hasn’t happened for many of the regulations put out by the Obama administration, either because of bureaucratic oversight or because they were considered too minor to be reported. Failing to report many of the rules is a “technical violation” of the statute, “and the law says they can’t take effect,” according to Robert Cramer, the GAO’s managing associate general counsel. But there’s another catch: Congress also barred such rules from judicial review. Two federal appeals courts and two district courts have upheld this principle even when the regulation in question was not submitted to Congress as required. Since Congress cannot pass a resolution of disapproval for a rule until it receives it, this means neither lawmakers nor the courts can step in and demand that agencies submit the required paperwork. The 1996 law at the center of this mess is the Congressional Review Act, or CRA, which added requirements for reporting most administrative rules to Congress. The idea — stemming from the Republican Party’s “Contract With America” — was that lawmakers would have a chance to overturn any pending regulations they didn’t like before they took effect. But Congress has only set aside one rule in the 18 years since, and bureaucrats and some lawmakers say the law has evolved into a major hassle. In addition to copies of each rule, agencies are supposed to provide a “concise general statement relating to the rule” and the rule’s effective date, all to be distributed to relevant committees. It’s also not entirely clear which rules need to be reported. In 2009, the House parliamentarian complained that the law had more than doubled the number of committee referrals it had to send out. “This flow of paper poses a significant increment of workload for a range of individuals,” according to a House Judiciary Committee report from that year. “It’s called the ‘Messenger Relief Act’ because it provided so much business to couriers,” said Jeff Lubbers, a professor at American University’s Washington College of Law. For years, the GAO tracked all the final regulations it had received. But starting in November 2011, it gave up monitoring all but the biggest rules in the face of staff cuts. Copeland, the retired research staffer, set out to tally how many rules had fallen by the wayside since: Out of more than 9,000 rules issued since the start of 2012, more than 1,800 were not reported to the GAO, he found. Most of the missing rules are minor. But 43 have been deemed “significant” by the Next Page: …and six of those count as major. Three rules published in early 2013 carried out the Pentagon’s sexual-assault prevention and response program; one was estimated to cost nearly $15 billion to implement. The only measure overturned since the law was passed was an ergonomics rule that the Labor Department adopted just before former president Bill Clinton left office. “This is a make-work statute,” said Columbia Law School professor Peter L. Strauss, an administrative and regulatory law specialist. “It creates volumes of paperwork for Congress and the GAO that sit on the floor.” Former senator Don Nickles (R-Okla.), one of the law’s original sponsors, said the statute helps lawmakers hold hearings and use other tactics to influence regulations before they take effect. Major rules are not supposed to go into force until 60 days after they are reported to Congress or published in the Federal Register, whichever is later. When informed about the hundreds of missing rules, Nickles — who now heads his own consulting and lobbying firm — said: “It sounds like they’re breaking the law.” http://www.truthandaction.org/study-obama-technically-broken-2000-laws-since-2012/
Only that many? Wow! I would have thought more. Gee, maybe we should back off on the poor misunderstood guy? NAH!!!!!
Find and close those loop holes, Then explain to the American citizens why nothing can be done
We need to break a few laws and phisocally remove his stupid ass from Washington. NOW
How disgusting.
Like, anyone is going to stop him.
And he is still in office. This really speaks highly of our government and all of them are still getting paid. Can you imagine anyone in a real job committing this many illegal acts and still have a job. One refusal of a order and that person is history. Does the government need some lessons from the civilized world? GD