State Department Political Correctness Goes Wild
Following the example set by elite liberal universities, the U.S. State Department has begun cracking down on “microaggressions” in the workplace. According to a newsletter from State Department chief diversity officer John Robinson, employees who commit “microaggressions” may risk violating harassment laws in doing so.
Robinson published a letter in the November edition of State Magazine with the title “The New Face of Exclusion: Microaggressions.” The magazine is meant to “facilitate communication between management and employees” and “acquaint employees with developments that may affect operations or personnel,” according to the State Department website. In the letter, Robinson explained to employees that microaggressions “are much harder to spot than overt discrimination” and “are often brushed off as lack of tact or an act of nonmalicious ignorance.”
“Microaggressions can be detrimental to employee morale and engagement,” Robinson insisted. “Left unaddressed, microaggressions can over time lead to workplace conflict and eventually affect operations.”
“Severe or pervasive microaggressions based on protected Equal Employment Opportunity categories may rise to the level of harassment under certain circumstances,” Robinson warned.
The State Department website also lists “jokes,” “offensive conduct,” “offensive comments,” and “verbal or physical conduct based on an individual’s race/color” as examples of harassment.
In his letter, Robinson borrows Columbia professor Derald Wing Sue’s definition of “microaggressions,” which Sue defines as “everyday verbal, nonverbal and environmental slights, snubs or insults, whether intentional or unintentional, which communicate hostile, derogatory or negative messages to target persons.”
Robinson did put forth a handful of example microaggressions in the letter, such as asking an Asian person “Where are you from?” He also offered his own definition of microaggressions: “insensitive questions and comments that leave you feeling a bit uneasy or slighted.”
Language and communication are complex and nuanced skills, and workplace interaction is full of examples where misunderstandings and imprecise expression are commonplace and occur daily. To pretend that it is possible to eliminate these pitfalls of communication, let alone the “micro-aggressions” that these clueless, challenged bureaucrats are bandying about is the height of ignorance and folly. I am offended by the idiocy displayed by these pretentious fools, to whom do I go to present my grievances?
Source: dailycaller.com
Anything to quiet the masses !
My husband is a Vietnam War Era Navy Veteran, just had a complete Prostectomy, from Cancer, we have been Fighting for almost 10 Years, to settle with WORKER’S COMPENSATION after the Owner of the Company, ran him over on the job, we had to file an APPEAL for VA BENEFITS INCREASE, we have a date next month!!! And, we on the verge of losing our home, Sell everything we own, to buy a travel trailer to Live in, And, THIS IS WHAT IS HOT TOPIC, in regards to AME RICAN CITIZENS , AND THEIR ” QUALITY OF LIFE “!!?? REALLY??
This article is not for liberals. They are unable to comprehend facts & Logic, due to their mental disease.
Sounds like we need a few “”Howling Mad Smiths”” to start tossing people out of offices.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4lfy4etaO0c&sns=fb
Words don’t hurt.
Safe places are f**e
Microaggressions isn’t even a word my spell check recognizes. When you have to imagine words to describe imagined insults you need professional help to return to reality.
I think its time for a new holiday: “Real Americans Brass Knuckles at Work” day. No “microaggressions”. Just punch that SOB in the face.
Hey where s the 6 billion dollars you stole from taxpayers?
There goes free speech . Can’t wait for thought control !