Starbucks made a poor decision when concluding that part of its business was to advocate for left-wing causes. Perhaps CEOs get bored with their jobs, or just let their emotions get the best of them, but when they decide to use their companies to advocate for highly politically-charged issues that have nothing to do with their businesses, they are taking an unnecessary risk.
Starbucks’ decision to enter the immigration debate on the side of the left is putting a dent in its brand and sales according to Credit Suisse. More on page two.
Bwhahahaha! I’ll drink to that but not Starbucks! Bwhahaha
They suck anyway!
Over priced garbage…..
They get what they deserve. .
Kurt Malerich, WELL SAID!!! That’s just what I said!! (You said it better, but, same thought.)
Too bad, Black Rifle Coffee Co. Rocks!!!!!
Reap what you sow!
Actions have consequences
Got to fire the$#%&!@*CEO, send him to Afghanistan, when he returns make him penniless and homeless, make him live the streets, we’ll see if he will still feel the same about VETS, and his ten thousand refugees!?!!!!. These people do not see what our VETS go through physically and mentally in training and then the actual war, they believe that our soldiers kills women and children, what they do not know is that the enemies uses women and children to attack our soldiers there, should our soldiers not fire back when attacked, just open their arms and greet the enemies with a huge smile!?!!!.
FLIP , FLOP , STOCK DROPS !