One of the biggest problems with legal decisions, including Supreme Court decisions, is that legal wranglings and minutia often override common sense and rationality and the law of unintended consequences often comes into play. The Democrats are absolutely determined to limit or do away with firearms in society, that much is known. American citizens have shown that they are determined to protect their 2nd Amendment rights, and so the Left must find other ways to take away the right to own a gun, and as often as not, that is accomplished by contriving some legal excuse to disarm Americans.
In the recent ruling of Voisine v. the United States, a surprising and outrageous decision was made that would prohibit citizens from owning a gun for the rest of their life if they have a minor car accident while texting that results in a minor injury to their spouse or child. Surely this is a nonsensical and unintended reading of the law, and yet it accomplishes exactly what Democrats want, which is the disarming of as many citizens as possible.
Read the Supreme Court decision on page 2:
Lock nLoad
Right On young man right on ….
Big b******t. Surely it will be further challenged by someone with common sense.
Yes School is where your rights as parents end and the state begins at the front door every time you drop them off .. …
Im afraid We the People will have to take our government back by Constitutional means of engagement. If true Americans stand up and join the fight the traitors will have no defense and will have to be replaced. Time is nearing, Crooked Hillary will still the election.
who got paid off???
Apply the same standards to the rest of the amendments……wait…they explicitly don’t say “shall not be infringed.”
Yes, that is why they are either outlawing homeschooling in some areas or discouraging it in others. They don’t want parents to have control of educating their own children.
See second amendment…..
The Constitution forbids judges or lawmakers from infringing or passing legislation “editing” any amendment outside a constitutional convention. That amendment process is laid out in Article V of the Constitution, which says that either supermajorities in both houses of Congress or a national convention can propose them and a larger supermajority of states must sign on in order to secure ratification.
The amendment process is laid out in Article V of the Constitution, which says that either supermajorities in both houses of Congress or a national convention can propose them and a larger supermajority of states must sign on in order to secure ratification.
Problem is there nothing to restore other than the constitutional rule of law.
The problem is dereliction of duty and treason….
Treason: crime of disloyalty to one’s nation or state. A person who bet,rays the nation of their citizenship and/or reneges on an oath of loyalty and in some way willfully cooperates with an enemy, is considered to be a traitor.
The defense of the Constitution requires members of the Armed Forces to disobey illegal orders. And, in the case of alleged treasonous acts, members of the Armed Forces are constitutionally bound to arrest such offenders. (See The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ, 64 Stat. 109, 10 U.S.C. §§ 801–946).
Now you have a choice between embracing the sometimes painful truth of reality (red pill) and the blissful ignorance of illusion (blue pill).
All it requires is for those who have taken their oaths of office to act on what they swore they would actually do.