One of the biggest problems with legal decisions, including Supreme Court decisions, is that legal wranglings and minutia often override common sense and rationality and the law of unintended consequences often comes into play. The Democrats are absolutely determined to limit or do away with firearms in society, that much is known. American citizens have shown that they are determined to protect their 2nd Amendment rights, and so the Left must find other ways to take away the right to own a gun, and as often as not, that is accomplished by contriving some legal excuse to disarm Americans.
In the recent ruling of Voisine v. the United States, a surprising and outrageous decision was made that would prohibit citizens from owning a gun for the rest of their life if they have a minor car accident while texting that results in a minor injury to their spouse or child. Surely this is a nonsensical and unintended reading of the law, and yet it accomplishes exactly what Democrats want, which is the disarming of as many citizens as possible.
Read the Supreme Court decision on page 2:
There will be a lot of criminals then because they can kiss this Americans white$#%&!@*! They’ll not be getting anything but a hurting come and try to take anything I own.
Right on point
Yeah! 85 million angry gun owners and a large % of them combat hardened veterans along with a large X military trained gun owners-that would be a suicide mission.
Unconstitutional laws are not law.
The supreme Court has no…….. authority to enact legislation…… period
So true
They keep fucking with the hornets nest
REVOLUTION would be the result of ANY attempt to take our guns away, of this I have no doubt.
Robert Boe That is one of my biggest concerns. A revolution would weaken America even more and our enemies would take advantage of that without a doubt.
They can try to pass all the laws they want to take away our guns but they just don’t get it do they.? They can’t have them no matter what they say Molon Labe