One of the biggest problems with legal decisions, including Supreme Court decisions, is that legal wranglings and minutia often override common sense and rationality and the law of unintended consequences often comes into play. The Democrats are absolutely determined to limit or do away with firearms in society, that much is known. American citizens have shown that they are determined to protect their 2nd Amendment rights, and so the Left must find other ways to take away the right to own a gun, and as often as not, that is accomplished by contriving some legal excuse to disarm Americans.
In the recent ruling of Voisine v. the United States, a surprising and outrageous decision was made that would prohibit citizens from owning a gun for the rest of their life if they have a minor car accident while texting that results in a minor injury to their spouse or child. Surely this is a nonsensical and unintended reading of the law, and yet it accomplishes exactly what Democrats want, which is the disarming of as many citizens as possible.
Read the Supreme Court decision on page 2:
Shut up. Liers..We AMERICANS live by our CONSTITUTION
It’s time to remove theses old farts from our justice system. They no longer represent the will of the people, and no longer have the capacity to use common sense.
Bs no more we bout to take our country back now if so
The 2nd Amendment is in the Bill of Rights! The Constitution was not ratified til Bill of Rights were added. Making them a permanent part of the Constitution! Article 6 Section 2 specifically states stated that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, Not the President, not Congress, and not Supreme court!!!
Wrong
no one has any trust in the supream court anymore. they are liberal tratiors to this country
The people have the power to remove the scotus and the representatives. They should realize they are about to start a revolt and they are the ones to blame.
The court is just people ! But, before they were judges, they were lawyers, who were not making enough, so they became judges, for a income. Everyone knows that a TOP lawyer, will earn more in one year, than any judge will make in a life time !
Good thing they will still be avalible illegally
•”To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps. Their maxim is boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem [good justice is broad jurisdiction], and their power the more dangerous as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves.” –Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis, 1820.