Governments try all the time to suppress the speech of company owners in the name of public safety; it’s nothing new. Remember the soda ban in New York? Now similar laws have made their way to San Francisco.
But, these laws don’t come without some controversy. Regulations like forced labeling of sugary drinks as well as a ban on these drinks from advertising on public spaces have some people up in arms against these laws.
The controversy has resulted in the city being sued.
FIND OUT MORE ABOUT THE LAWSUIT ON THE NEXT PAGE:
Dawn, it’s not stopping you from making a choice or making a list of restrictions on what you buy and consume…it’s about the the marketing/adverti$#%&!@*t and warning labels on those products.
It’s a start. Always starts off small… Strategic…
Corporations have zero humanity rights. The market and people dictate what is allowed. The government is supposed to back that up.
Some of us have been trying for years.
What dr pepper isn’t a real doctor and Mountain Dew isn’t made from mountain spring water.
This is for people who need the government to control what they can or cannot eat. I am not so far gone, as of yet, that I can not determine what sustinance my body needs. Why do people continually seek dependence? Can’t make decisions themselves?
Welcome to the most retarded country
Yes they do.
“Warning: The US government contains high levels of “muslim brotherhood , black militant, atheist, gay agenda, anti – American” members who ARE taking your God given Cons$#%&!@*utional rights away daily in front of your “I don’t want to deal or believe it” face….
I digress.
Of course San Fran, and NY Bloomburg tri to outdo each other.