The left truly is home to the champions of free speech — free speech with which they agree. College campuses all across America have been banning speech that has been determined too offensive — conservative — for their delicate little ears. College campuses used to be a place where students went to expand their horizons, hear new viewpoints, and form their own opinions based on their experiences. This is no longer the case.
Leftist activists have turned college campuses into giant safe spaces — liberal, fact-free cocoons where the little college cupcakes are protected from the harsh realities of life.
On the rare occasions that conservative speakers are invited to speak on campuses they are greeted by massive — often violent — protests. Even comedians such as Chris Rock and Jerry Seinfeld — who aren’t even conservative — refuse to perform comedy acts on college campuses anymore because the overgrown toddlers are so easily offended.
Now, in a perfect example of how liberals justify the silencing of free speech, the Vice-President of the National Union of Students told the BBC that it is important to shut down some free speech because “some people have more equal rights than others.” To watch this astonishingly Orwellian response, continue on the next page:
Animal Farm Orwell. Do these peope even know that that is? We learned that in High School.
Whatever college brainwashed this poor fool should be closed immediately
Surely this can’t be real
Sadly these are our college students, who can’t even read and comprehend the Constitution
HERE IS A SAFE PLACE FOR YOUR SORRY
morons
p***y.
I’ll bet his dad is real prpud of whatever he is. MORON! MAYBE DADDY IS A MORON TOO!
Oh no,lmfao
Have you noticed that for the Left, one’s rights come from membership in a group (as defined by a community organizer) rather than from the Divinely endowed and self-evident Natural Rights conferred by every human being’s sovereignty over his or her own person? Therefore, according to the Left, rights are not Natural, and are neither inalienable nor self-evident, but are a gift that is bestowed as consequential to one’s membership in a group, and may therefore be removed according to the necessities of the group. “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the one.” As defined by the collectivist, rights come from the collective of being “gay,” or “trans,” or “black,” or “female,” or “Muslim” or even “white male.” Each collective, however, is part of the larger collective of society (which in turn has its own needs) and the rights of any group (or member of that group) may be sacrificed to the overall requirements of society.
After all, that’s what Marcusian Repressive Tolerance is based upon; isn’t it?