Do Democrats really dislike the possibility of foreign nations interfering with elections, or do they only dislike it when they lose? This is not an academic question. As you’ll see in a moment, there is evidence to support the belief that Democratic office holders enlisted Russian interference to benefit their candidates several election cycles ago.
This current tempest over the theory that Russia might have hacked the DNC’s servers, then dumped those emails on the internet via WikiLeaks in an effort to help elect Trump, contains a lot of irony. Not the least of which is the fact that Obama spent at least several hundred thousand dollars trying to topple Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu.
That doesn’t make other nations’ alleged interference in US elections okay. But it does make Obama a hypocrite if he starts pointing accusing fingers at the Russians.
More evidence of DNC collusion with the Russians in previous elections on page two.
Please President Trump hurry up and clean the swamp.
Same game New faces
Not surprising. Hypocritical, but that’s no surprise either.
Yup, Ted Kennedy….Aug 28, 2009 – Andropov.” Kennedy’s message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election.
Saw this and heard every word. What a lying$#%&!@*Obama is.
Thank you, Sir!
Media silent on this.
Actual Russian interference….
Shut these criminals down! Drain the swamp!
they will due any thing and say any thing to keep trump out of the white house they know if he gets in there will be a big change and they don’t want that thay are not for us we the people