According to House Intel Chair Mike Rogers, Obama knows where the Benghazi terrorists are, but won’t go after them.
Rogers claims this is because of Obama’s ‘kindler, gentler approach” to Al-Qaeda.
So kind, I guess, that 1.5 years after the Benghazi attack we have done nothing? We’re ‘so kind’ to terrorists now that we don’t retaliate in any way for the deaths of Americans.
I appreciate Rogers pointing out that that Obama won’t go after the those responsible for the Benghazi attacks, even though we could, and I appreciate that he states Obama has a ‘softer, gentler approach’ to the terrorist group that we at one time considered our greatest threat, but it isn’t that Obama won’t go after the Benghazi terrorists because he ‘nicer’ to them.
What Rogers would probably like to say:
Obama won’t go after the Benghazi terrorists because for one, he just doesn’t care, and two, he certainly doesn’t want someone showing up in front of a camera saying something to indicate Obama’s true intentions and actions regarding Benghazi.
And secondly, Obama isn’t becoming ‘nicer’ to terrorists, he is one.
I do know we need a man in the whitehouse instead of a puss.
Wimp in = Wimp OUT
of course not. why would he go after his own people. wake up america
That is because they will rat him out on being behind the terrorist attack.
of course not they must be some of his relatives
I didn’t vote him in….and the electrol vote c**p is way too old for this day and age
I’M AFRAID HE IS ONE OF THEM!
well hes the one that gave them the weapons what do you think thats why he didnt get the americans agency over there for so long impeach and imprison asap
Because he’s apparently on the Al-Qaeda Board of Directors…!
All the poor pitiful idiots who voted for him.