For those of us who treasure the Consitution and the form of government it establishes, the idea of elected officials holding and promoting beliefs in clear violation of that Constitution is repugnant. They should have never been elected in the first place, and now that they are there, they should be removed from office. How can you reconcile swearing to uphold the Constitution, while promoting beliefs that would undermine it? That question may sound simplistic, but that’s because the contridiction is so obvious.
Keith Ellison, Democrat from Minnesota, is a Muslim. Of course, it’s his right to practice the faith of his choice. The question is whether he endorses Sharia Law and the Islamic form of government. If so, he should not be in public office because it is impossible to support both Sharia Law and the US Constitution.
Given Mr. Ellison’s past associations, it is reasonable to question his loyalty to our Constitution.
Rep. Keith Ellison (D., Minn.) during a 2008 trip to Saudi Arabia met with a radical Muslim cleric who endorsed killing U.S. soldiers and the president of a bank used to pay the families of Palestinian suicide bombers.
Ellison, now a leading candidate to head the Democratic National Committee, was brought to Saudi Arabia for a two-week trip by the Muslim American Society (MAS), a group founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood to act as its “overt arm” in the United States.
There we see the Muslim Brotherhood in action. This is a group that wishes to dispense with the US Constitution, not support it.
A photo album of Ellison’s hajj trip posted by MAS’s Minnesota chapter includes a picture of the congressman meeting with Sheikh Abdallah Bin Bayyah, who was vice president of a Muslim Brotherhood-created group that in 2004 issued a fatwa urging “jihad” against U.S. troops in Iraq and supported the Palestinians’ Second Intifada against Israel.
“The Jihad-waging Iraqi people’s resistance to the foreign occupation … is a Shari’a duty incumbent upon anyone belonging to the Muslim nation,” the fatwa said, according to a translation by the Middle East Media Research Institute.
Bin Bayyah’s group, the International Association of Muslim Scholars, issued the fatwa after a conference in Beirut, Lebanon.
The group was founded by Yusuf Qaradawi, a Muslim Brotherhood leader who was banned from visiting the United States because of his calls to kill Jews and Americans.
Bin Biyyah issued an additional fatwa in 2009, shortly after his meeting with Ellison, “barring all forms of normalization with Israel.”
If you are known by the company you keep, Mr. Ellison’s loyality to America must be called into question. It was discovered that he spoke highly of the radical Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. As was pointed out at the time that was revealed, “If this is someone Congressman Ellison has supported, he has several problems — and he richly needs to be defeated in 2018 should he choose to run for re-election.”
If the people of Ellison’s district really cannot help themselves, but are driven some strange desire for self-destruction to continually elect Democrats to represent them, surely they could find one whose loyalities are not as compromised as are those of Keith Ellison.
Source: The Washington Freebeacon
The muslims helped$#%&!@*during WW2 and wanted to have their own death camps to kill as many Jews and other “infidels” which includes ALL non-believers and have a 30 plan to slowly overthrow our government. That’s why islam and all muslims are already illegal in this country and you’ve all seen the bill or know how to find it. These are the kind of genocidal freaks that the liberals have been in love with for decades. What’s wrong with such people? God help us all and please convert the muslims from the false gods which they worship.
Minn Michigan California are shithole states
Of course!
Too many muslims snuck into our Government !!! This should be outlawed !!!
Well give up up guns people…hand them over right now
Yes, but all of this is well known. The Lib-Loons vote for him anyway. he puts a (D) after his name. In Lib world that’s all you need. In truth he should have an (M) for Muslim after his name. It would be much more accurate!
just another bigot terrorist
We saved them them and allowed them in our Country. They say them want to infratrate into our Country and take over. What is Ellison doing in in a terrorist Country. We don’t know what there up to. It’s they go back to their own Country. You can’t trust a word they saw. Time to leave or interrigate them for their crimes in our Country.
Kaine doesn’t have enough to do!
We MUST Enforce this Law! Islam, by law, is prohibited from US immigration!
The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “force, violence, or other unlawful means.” This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House.Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life’s guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Now the political correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any “organization” that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited
CHAPTER 2-QUALIFICATIONS FOR ADMISSION OF ALIENS; TRAVEL CONTROL OF CITIZENS AND ALIENS
212 GENERAL CLASSES OF ALIENS INELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE VISAS AND INELIGIBLE FOR ADMISSION; WAIVERS OF INADMISSIBILITY
(3) SECURITY AND RELATED GROUNDS.-
(iii) any activity a purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or overthrow of, the Government of the United States by force, violence, or other unlawful means, is inadmissible.
You can read it in it’s entirety at:
Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952
http://www.immigration-usa.com/ina_96_title_2.html