Albert N. Stubblebine III is a retired Major General in the U.S. Army and commanding general of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command.
When it comes to both speaking about and respecting the horrific tragedy that unfolded on 9/11, nobody is his parallel.
In this jaw-dropping interview, he shares exactly what he thinks really happened that day. And it’s not what you’ve been told.
His perspectives as an insider familiar with the military give a very different perspective than what played out on television screens across the world.
And why might you ask? Why is the man who dropped to his knees in horror that day, revisiting the narrative to say his piece on the truth?
Major General Stubblebine outlined the heartbreaking truth in an explosive interview that it is ludicrous for any intelligent military intelligence commander to take the official 9/11 narrative as a viable explanation for what occurred on Sept. 11th, 2011. And furthermore, that they do not.
More on the next page, and this official interview,
I don’t think Bush’s were capable of developing such a strategic plan. This was orchestrated with such precision and had to take many years to accomplish! Me personally I’m pretty much convinced the owner had something to do with it Kama with knowledge gain prior to this horrific incident which was why his insurance was boosted. The American people do not want to get into Wars unless severely provoked.
We can look at the media today on how they cover all the riots and elections and how they are very biased, manipulating and controlling. They use all these tactics that are diversionary and are designed to manipulate one group of population while silencing the others who don’t agree.
All of the crimes that have been committed by various politicians get brushed under the rug with more distractionary news so people lose focus on the core issues and facts…
The 21 Muslims who boarded the planes were real .and so were their box cutter
Where were you standing Bob? I was onscene within an hour of the attack and there was nonplane debris. Spoke with a state trooper who stated whatever it was came ober the bridge at supersonic speed before it struck the Pentagon. Stop making up storied to prop up the official story.
Bush took those buildings down. Part of there plan to change course of America and look how it’s changed in 17 yrs
The 1st attack against thr WTC was under CLINTON …and not under any of the bushes.
.but liberals WANT the pl to forget that
I agree with this man that the quips popping out of the sides of the buildings where the result of controlled explosions. The odds of a building this size falling straight down are astronomical. For two buildings this size to fall straight down or even more astronomical.
Does anybody remember how many attempts were used to bring down these buildings prior to 9/11? The steel for the girders does not melt the way they melted from jet fuel as it takes a higher level of heat. Does anybody not wonder why much of the steel was removed right away almost disposed of shall we say? The reason is because there is physical evidence that could have been determined at the key locations.
I saw a missile strike the Pentagon….
And the twin towers were not brought down by burning airplane fuel.
Bob. No wings or wing damage. No engines. No luggage or seats strewn about. Pilots say that the route could not be flown. It was a missile strike directly in the records office that prevented an audit that would have uncovered three trillion dollars were missing from pentagon.
He will be dead before he gets the details out.