Albert N. Stubblebine III is a retired Major General in the U.S. Army and commanding general of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command.
When it comes to both speaking about and respecting the horrific tragedy that unfolded on 9/11, nobody is his parallel.
In this jaw-dropping interview, he shares exactly what he thinks really happened that day. And it’s not what you’ve been told.
His perspectives as an insider familiar with the military give a very different perspective than what played out on television screens across the world.
And why might you ask? Why is the man who dropped to his knees in horror that day, revisiting the narrative to say his piece on the truth?
Major General Stubblebine outlined the heartbreaking truth in an explosive interview that it is ludicrous for any intelligent military intelligence commander to take the official 9/11 narrative as a viable explanation for what occurred on Sept. 11th, 2011. And furthermore, that they do not.
More on the next page, and this official interview,
He’s not the only one who said that. Big cover up.
Saw airplanes go into the towers…Saw reckage.Where did the airplanes go if not into the towers?
Wake up people, evidence is overwhelming that in fact, a American airlines plane hit the Pentagon. Photo of plan debris inside the building.
Plane debris deeper inside the building.
Piece of aircraft laying on lawn outside building.
Don’t believe Bush had anything to do with it!
Paul B. We can go into LFL’s and the behavior of combustion processes which do play into the feeding of the fuel with higher amounts of oxygen, not % as in oxygen enrichment, but mass flow. So called fire proof materials at those temperatures firstly are fire resistant, then become flammable. Materials are not truly fire proof, they are fire resistant and that characteristic is a function of temperature.
However, let’s focus on the steel beams since of my two backgrounds the metallurgical vs the combustion factors is easier to envision. Besides, the fuel and other materials plus air (O2 in air) is the cause. The effect is directly on the metal structure.
Let’s assume 1500F is the maximum fuel temperature attained that heated up the steel beams. However, add in the so called fire prof materials and that temperature can rise in local spots and if around a structural element will only hasten the decrease in structural strength.
There is a process called annealing. It is the heating up of a material to a set temperature to essentially relieve stresses caused by cold working. The result in that state is a softer, more pliable material. (Glass can be annealed as well, it is an extreme example of softening until melting, a glass blower does not melt glass, it is softened so it can be worked). That softened state increases as temperature increases and significantly decreases the material’s strength, in this case a steel beam or other structural element. It no longer can support the weight it was designed to support above it. It did not have to melt. As one element fails, the next element in the design now has to bear more and more of the load. As each structural element, in cascade fashion (that’s why the uninformed confuse it with staged blast points at each successively lower floor) fails and detaches or pulls away from its structural hanger, each successive piece is now called on to support more and more weight. More weight to support means higher stress, higher stress means that successive given structural elements now fail at lower and lower temperatures to the point where the weight becomes so much that cold steel can now bend and collapse from the sheer concentration of forces (called cold working) from the failures and deflection forces of the elements above it. An I beam is stronger in its traditional orientation and building are designed to this spec plus a safety factor, not at any angle that deviates from that orientation which will happen as the building structure twists and racks.
There are many just as good and even better more comprehensive explanations. Seek them out.
Quora has some excellent discussions on this issue.
It is best, if you are so inclined, to initially put aside the twin tower example and gather and understand the fundamentals first and assemble them as the tools they will later be called on to address the terrible twin towers toppled topic. ( hmm, alliteration…)
The conspiracy theories drive those of us who have engineering degrees in mechanical, metallurgical (materials), and combustion engineering to shake our heads at either the ignorance of not knowing what one does not know. (Example: Rosie O’Donnell telling everyone on The View that fire can’t melt steel. I wonder how that steel got reduced into liquid form in the first place…But more to the issue, that it didn’t have to melt, merely lose strength as temperature rises. Getting into the cascading failure effect would probably fry her brain). Or, chases down tiny kernels of mistruths and flawed observation to come to a conclusion that backfills their own conspiratorial narrative. Do this in any engineering test and you will fail, sooner if in college, later and big time if you do it in real life as a so-called “expert.”
Really? I said he was at the Pentegon, not inside it. He was driving, when he saw the plane. I mentioned him, because I know, and trust him, but there were many more eyewitnesses, who were driving, in the oarking lot, walking, etcetera. In order for this conspiracy theory to be true, all those eyewitnesses had to have been coordinated, to lie. You seem eager to assume facts, which are not presented, to support the theory that no plane hit the Pentagon, and I suspect that no fact will convince you otherwise. What is your purpose, for disputing what happened?
Robyn Schlegel I’ve been an in the Army since 2004 with two combat deployments and multiple other missions around the world speak for yourself. Being former military only lends you validation for so long after you leave service because our intelligence and compartmentalizations for information, who is privy to things , is specifically designed so that you can’t know everything or have access to it. Only what you are assigned to do or operations you are apart of. The way the world and military changes intelligence reports and how things are seen and viewed have a short shelf life.
Mike Stempo,well put, the cascading effect we all witnessed, is also the pancake effect, in which once one floor fails and sets all the weight above it in motion incredible forces come into play due to gravity alone and nothing below it can withstand those stress loads.