Reaganomics Architect: Trump is Now Controlled by the ‘Deep State’ After Committing War Crime

Some of President Trump’s actions have appeared to be incongruous when compared with his campaign statements. For example, his intervention in Syria which had such a negative impact on his relations with Russia and President Putin is inconsistent with his position during the campaign. What changed?

According to Paul Craig Roberts who served during the Reagan administration as assistant secretary of the treasury and who also was an associate editor at the Wall Street Journal, President Trump has been compromised by the Deep State which is exerting a great deal of control over his behavior.

Roberts sets up his argument by proposing that the Deep State has conducted false flag attacks, in particular 9/11.

When the gullible and insouciant American public and the presstitutes who participate in the deceptions permitted the Deep State to get away with the fairy tale that a few Saudi Arabians under the direction of Osama bin Laden, but without the support of any government or intelligence agency, were able to outwit the entirety of the Western Alliance and Israel’s Mossad and deliver the greatest humiliation in history to “the world’s only superpower” by making the entirety of the US government dysfunctional on September 11, 2001, Washington learned that it could get away with anything, any illegal and treasonous act, any lie. The gullible Western populations would believe anything that they were told.

That is one of the most serious accusations that has ever been made. Of course, we’ve heard it before, but typically not from someone of Robert’s stature.

Roberts continues:

When Obama inherited the Deep State’s agenda from George W. Bush, he set up Syria’s Assad for regime change by repeating for many months that if Assad used chemical weapons in the “civil war” that Washington had sent ISIS to conduct, Assad would have crossed the “Red Line” that Obama had drawn and would, as the consequence, face an invasion by the US military, just as Iraq had been invaded based on Washington’s lie about “weapons of mass destruction.”

Having burnt this idea into the feeble minds of the Western populations, Obama then arranged for a chemical weapon to be exploded in Syria and blamed it on Assad. Thus, the Red Line had been crossed, the insouciant West was told, and America would now invade.

This, according to Roberts, set up the conditions and structure which were used to gain control over President Trump’s agenda.

And so Washington has rolled out this hoax a second time. During a Syrian air force attack on an ISIS position, a chemical weapon exploded, or so it is alleged. Instantly Washington said that Assad had used “Sarin gas against his own people.” Trump was shown photos of dead babies and stupidly ordered a US military strike against Syria.

This attack is what Robert’s claims the Deep State used to compromise President Trump.

This was the first time that Washington had engaged in an unambigious war crime without any cover. Trump had no UN resolution, not even one that could be stood on its head as in Libya. Trump had no NATO participation, no George W. Bush “coalition of the willing” to give cover to the war crime with the support of other governments.

There are no skirts for Trump to hid behind. He stupidly let himself be pushed into commiting an unambigious war crime.

Now all his opponents—the Deep State, the military/security complex, the CIA, the Hillary Democrats, the warmonger Republicans—have the New White House Fool under their control. If Trump doesn’t do as they want, they will impeach him for his war crime.

The seriousness of those accusations and assertions cannot be over estimated. It would imply that the fate of the world lies in the hands of shadowy individuals who remain out of view, but who are calling the moves, nonetheless.

The questions before us could not be any clearer: Will Russia and China break and give in to Washington? If not, will Washington become a good world citizen for the first time in America’s history, or will Washington issue more threats, thereby convincing Russia and China that their alternative is to wait for Washington’s preemptive nuclear strike or deliver one themselves?

This is the only question that the world faces that is worth our attention. I spent a quarter century in Washington. The evil that is in control there at the present time is unprecedented. I have never seen anything like it.

Robert’s concludes with a very ominous question:

Can the world survive the evil that is concentrated in Washington, evil that has the support of the governments of the Western world?

Source: Paul Craig Roberts